Skip to content

Conversation

@kukushking
Copy link
Contributor

Detail

  • Hotfix to avoid OOMs when computing index for multi-file distributed datasets

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@malachi-constant
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubCodeBuild8756EF16-4rfo0GHQ0u9a
  • Commit ID: 74dc929
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@malachi-constant
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubDistributedCodeBuild6-jWcl5DLmvupS
  • Commit ID: 74dc929
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@jaidisido jaidisido left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We would need to xfail all of these tests in dist mode only:

tests/unit/test_s3_parquet.py::test_index_recovery_partitioned_str
tests/unit/test_s3_parquet.py::test_empty_file
tests/unit/test_s3_parquet.py::test_index_and_timezone

Feel free to merge once that is covered, thanks!

@kukushking
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @jaidisido just wanted to let cicd fail to see if only those tests are causing trouble.

@malachi-constant
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubCodeBuild8756EF16-4rfo0GHQ0u9a
  • Commit ID: 1869c6f
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@malachi-constant
Copy link
Contributor

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: GitHubDistributedCodeBuild6-jWcl5DLmvupS
  • Commit ID: 1869c6f
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@LeonLuttenberger LeonLuttenberger merged commit 56a55a8 into main May 10, 2023
@LeonLuttenberger LeonLuttenberger deleted the fix/distributed-ignore-index branch May 10, 2023 17:44
@jaidisido jaidisido restored the fix/distributed-ignore-index branch May 15, 2023 15:22
@jaidisido jaidisido deleted the fix/distributed-ignore-index branch May 15, 2023 15:22
jaidisido added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants