Skip to content

Conversation

@obrep
Copy link
Contributor

@obrep obrep commented Jun 15, 2020

The package exists under the name 'sagemaker-inference'. This change fixes the name for the pip install command from nonexistant 'sagemaker-inference-toolkit'

Issue #, if available:
None

Description of changes:
Changed the name of package to 'sagemaker-inference' in the pip install command in README.md

Testing done:
None, documentation change

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have used the regional endpoint when creating S3 and/or STS clients (if appropriate)
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

The package exists under the name 'sagemaker-inference'. This change fixes the name for the pip install command from nonexistant 'sagemaker-inference-toolkit'
@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-inference-toolkit-pr
  • Commit ID: d1dc518
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@laurenyu
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the contribution!

@laurenyu laurenyu merged commit 3a92134 into aws:master Jun 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants