Fix: Refine AxACE Reflector to Use Only Input Fields #464
Conversation
The AxACE optimizer's reflector was previously using the entire training example as the "question" for reflection, including output fields. This caused confusion, as the reflector was seeing both the inputs and the expected outputs, leading to inaccurate and unhelpful reflections. This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that only the input fields from an example are used as the "question" for the reflector. The code now retrieves the program's signature, identifies the defined input fields, and constructs a `questionContext` object containing only the input key-value pairs from the full example. By providing a clean separation between the input and output, the reflector can now generate more accurate and relevant insights, improving the overall effectiveness of the ACE optimization loop.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
This commit fixes a bug in the AxACE optimizer where the reflector was incorrectly using the entire training example, including output fields, as input. This change ensures that only the input fields are passed to the reflector, improving the accuracy of its reflections.
Fixes #461
PR created automatically by Jules for task 1781258460039495023 started by @dosco