Differences Between C# and Java driver

There are very few differences between the official Java and C# driver. Those differences are outlined here:

Raw Format Options

The Java driver can accept format options in runOpts when calling .run(conn, runOpts). The Java driver supports the following format options:

• time_format: 'raw'
• binary_format: 'raw'
• group_format: 'raw'

The format options bypass the Java Converter's $reql_type$ pseudo type to native type conversion. For example, specifying time_format: 'raw' leaves $reql_type$:TIME JSON objects as is.

Using raw types in C# driver

To bypass the C# JSON deserialization converters and leave $reql_type$ pseudo types as is, simply declare your expected types as JObjects. For example,

JObject result = r.now().run<JObject>(conn);
result["$reql_type$"].ToString().Should().Be("TIME");

---

Internal Architecture Differences

This section mostly only pertains to contributors and driver developers.

Serialization

The only major difference between the C# and Java driver is the serialization and deserialization process. The C# driver uses the industry standard Newtonsoft Json.NET library. The C# Converter class is mostly used as a configuration hub for Newtonsoft serializer where as the Java Converter class is directly involved in converting ReQL pesudo types.