Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QA] remove some magic mining constants in functional tests #15238

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019

Conversation

instagibbs
Copy link
Member

@instagibbs instagibbs commented Jan 23, 2019

The fewer magic numbers the better.

Also more directly tested a submitheader case of bad previous blockhash.

@instagibbs instagibbs changed the title remove some magic mining constants in functional tests [QA] remove some magic mining constants in functional tests Jan 23, 2019
@fanquake fanquake added the Tests label Jan 23, 2019
@instagibbs instagibbs force-pushed the magic_miner branch 2 times, most recently from 15b0e3c to d37b1c3 Compare January 24, 2019 14:46
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Jan 24, 2019

utACK b651ef7

@Empact
Copy link
Contributor

Empact commented Jan 25, 2019

utACK b651ef7

maflcko pushed a commit to maflcko/bitcoin-core that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
…ional tests

b651ef7 submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
@maflcko maflcko merged commit b651ef7 into bitcoin:master Feb 12, 2019
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
from test_framework.messages import (
CBlock,
CBlockHeader,
BLOCK_HEADER_SIZE
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-nit: Missing trailing , 👀

assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'Must submit previous header', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata='ff' * 80))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, 'Block header decode failed', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata='xx' * BLOCK_HEADER_SIZE))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, 'Block header decode failed', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata='ff' * (BLOCK_HEADER_SIZE-2)))
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'Must submit previous header', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata=super(CBlock, bad_block).serialize().hex()))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currentry, minimum required version of Python (test) is 3.4.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/dependencies.md

But hex() seems to be introdued in Python 3.5.
https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=bytes%20hex#bytes.hex

I got following error when executing this test on Python3.4.

AttributeError: 'bytes' object has no attribute 'hex'

@Sjors
Copy link
Member

Sjors commented Feb 20, 2019

This test also fails for me locally on Python 3.4. If you install PyEnv it will catch this.

Fixed in #15439

deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
Summary: Backport of Core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#15238 | PR15238]]

Test Plan: `ninja && ./test/functional/test_runner.py interface_rest mining_basic`

Reviewers: O1 Bitcoin ABC, #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Reviewed By: O1 Bitcoin ABC, #bitcoin_abc, Fabien

Subscribers: Fabien

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7714
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2021
…ional tests

b651ef7 submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2021
…ional tests

b651ef7 submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2021
…ional tests

b651ef7 submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
vijaydasmp pushed a commit to vijaydasmp/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2021
…ional tests

b651ef7 submitheader: more directly test missing prev block header (Gregory Sanders)
1e7f741 remove some magic mining constants in functional tests (Gregory Sanders)

Pull request description:

  The fewer magic numbers the better.

  Also more directly tested a `submitheader` case of bad previous blockhash.

Tree-SHA512: 52b01a6aa199fa909eea4e9e84409a901933e545724e33149cc4132c82168199fd678809b6d94d95c9ff6ad02238a9552363620d13b8beaa5d4b67ade9ef425c
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants