Skip to content

Conversation

jprusik
Copy link
Contributor

@jprusik jprusik commented Oct 13, 2025

📔 Objective

linting passed on original branch, failed when merged #674

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
    issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@jprusik jprusik self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Claude finished @jprusik's task —— View job


Lint Fix PR Review ✅

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
  • Examine the changed file to understand the lint fixes
  • Compare changes against main branch
  • Install dependencies and run linting commands (permission restricted)
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback
  • Final comment update with review results

Review Summary

👍 Overall Assessment: The lint fixes are appropriate and well-executed. This PR successfully addresses line length violations without changing the meaning or structure of the content.

Changes Analysis

The PR fixes formatting issues in docs/getting-started/mobile/ios/index.md at lines 46-48:

Before (lines too long):

> If you're using [swiftly](https://github.com/swiftlang/swiftly) to manage Swift versions, some packages require
> a different Swift version than the default one, which can cause conflicts.
> If you see related errors, try **`swiftly run Scripts/bootstrap.sh +xcode`**.

After (properly wrapped):

> If you're using [swiftly](https://github.com/swiftlang/swiftly) to manage Swift versions, some
> packages require a different Swift version than the default one, which can cause conflicts. If
> you see related errors, try **`swiftly run Scripts/bootstrap.sh +xcode`**.

✅ What's Good

  1. Preserves Content Integrity: The changes maintain the exact same meaning and information
  2. Proper Line Breaking: Lines are broken at natural word boundaries
  3. Maintains Block Quote Formatting: The > prefixes are preserved correctly
  4. Consistent Style: Aligns with the repository's documentation formatting standards
  5. Minimal Scope: Only fixes the specific linting issue without unnecessary changes

📝 Technical Notes

  • The changes address what appears to be a line length linting rule violation
  • The original PR Update iOS docs #674 likely introduced longer lines that exceeded the project's line length limit
  • The fix maintains proper Markdown block quote syntax throughout
  • No functional or semantic changes to the documentation content

🎯 Compliance Check

According to the repository's CLAUDE.md guidelines, this change follows best practices:

  • ✅ Edits existing file rather than creating new ones
  • ✅ Maintains established formatting patterns
  • ✅ Keeps content concise and properly structured
  • ✅ Should pass npm run lint checks (though I cannot verify due to permission restrictions)

Recommendation

APPROVE - This is a clean, focused lint fix that addresses the formatting issues introduced in PR #674 without any negative side effects. The changes are minimal, appropriate, and maintain content quality.


Copy link

Deploying contributing-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: e4c7bfc
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://ee1a0ae0.contributing-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://lint-fix.contributing-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@jprusik jprusik marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2025 16:08
@jprusik jprusik requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 16:08
Copy link

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsd9e0b1a6-aebe-42ac-8415-9938f0607251

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@jprusik jprusik merged commit 8790664 into main Oct 13, 2025
12 checks passed
@jprusik jprusik deleted the lint-fix branch October 13, 2025 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants