Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Travis fails but shows success #39

Closed
dellaert opened this issue Jun 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Travis fails but shows success #39

dellaert opened this issue Jun 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@varunagrawal @jlblancoc

Comments

@dellaert
Copy link
Member

dellaert commented Jun 1, 2019

As an example, this run did not run the tests but failed (why?, was just a warning), but still shows up as a success.
@dellaert
Copy link
Member Author

dellaert commented Jun 1, 2019

Travis is awesome ! We'll get it right :-)

@jlblancoc
Copy link
Member

Hmm... I think the point is that Travis build #5, here, spans into the matrix of jobs we defined and only one of jobs failed, this one, 5.2... in this case due to a timeout (50 minutes) 🤦‍♂️

Any of the admins, could try hitting the "retry" button of job 5.2, since sometimes build times differ depending on the load of the server.

Anyhow, it seems we'll have to use Travis CI's "stages" to overcome the time limit (sigh)

@varunagrawal varunagrawal self-assigned this Jun 1, 2019
@dellaert
Copy link
Member Author

dellaert commented Jun 3, 2019

Fixed issues in pr #45

@dellaert dellaert closed this as completed Jun 3, 2019
varunagrawal added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2021
@varunagrawal
Squashed 'wrap/' changes from d19cda546..91f3835a8
ec48b14 
91f3835a8 Merge pull request #39 from borglab/fix/deepcopy
b64e01744 don't remove underscore for instantiations
80c060b52 monkey patch deepcopy issue in pyparsing

git-subtree-dir: wrap
git-subtree-split: 91f3835a8a69919ccb67435c567803f162faeac7
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@varunagrawal varunagrawal

@jlblancoc jlblancoc

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@varunagrawal @jlblancoc @dellaert