Skip to content

Conversation

@antonok-edm
Copy link
Collaborator

closes #524

(This is already fixed in the 0.11.x branch; this is just a fix for the 0.10.x series)

@antonok-edm antonok-edm self-assigned this Sep 29, 2025
@antonok-edm antonok-edm requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2025 20:17
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rust Benchmark

Benchmark suite Current: f90057e Previous: ea5dc7a Ratio
rule-match-browserlike/brave-list 2150805622 ns/iter (± 8645768) 2254218250 ns/iter (± 9092623) 0.95
rule-match-first-request/brave-list 1071008 ns/iter (± 7613) 1040226 ns/iter (± 7997) 1.03
blocker_new/brave-list 161689836 ns/iter (± 1571020) 155889016 ns/iter (± 929089) 1.04
blocker_new/brave-list-deserialize 63750086 ns/iter (± 1284435) 68301030 ns/iter (± 841217) 0.93
memory-usage/brave-list-initial 18344503 ns/iter (± 3) 18344519 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
memory-usage/brave-list-initial/max 66961277 ns/iter (± 3) 66961309 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
memory-usage/brave-list-initial/alloc-count 1616082 ns/iter (± 3) 1616130 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
memory-usage/brave-list-1000-requests 2551890 ns/iter (± 3) 2551938 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
memory-usage/brave-list-1000-requests/alloc-count 68816 ns/iter (± 3) 68864 ns/iter (± 3) 1.00
url_cosmetic_resources/brave-list 189075 ns/iter (± 1388) 206048 ns/iter (± 1753) 0.92
cosmetic-class-id-match/brave-list 5119900 ns/iter (± 1511311) 4279031 ns/iter (± 1162303) 1.20

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@antonok-edm antonok-edm force-pushed the include-removeparam-in-data-format branch from bb28004 to f90057e Compare September 29, 2025 20:28
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Rust Benchmark'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.10.

Benchmark suite Current: f90057e Previous: ea5dc7a Ratio
cosmetic-class-id-match/brave-list 5119900 ns/iter (± 1511311) 4279031 ns/iter (± 1162303) 1.20

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@antonok-edm antonok-edm merged commit ff2d788 into master Sep 30, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@antonok-edm antonok-edm deleted the include-removeparam-in-data-format branch September 30, 2025 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

removeparam filters not included in the serialized format

3 participants