Markup schema fix for recurring elements #64
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
September 3, 2015 15:45
…rence element name
… clarify the intent
Member
|
Hi, I like both commits, but we should keep them on a new branch for a future release since the current standards version is fixed as-is. |
Author
|
Ok. Found one more similar issue in visinfo.xsd - fix is also included here. |
Member
|
There's nothing you have to do right now, we'll have a telecon at 28.09.about the specification and then decide on what to do next. You may join us if you want, please contact me at dangl@iabi.eu. |
This was referenced Nov 10, 2015
Member
|
Accepted for 2.1 / Will overhaul all schemas (iabi) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BIMSnippet to unbounded, remove plural from DocumentReferences and Relatedtopics element names. Maybe this is the original intent?