Stage "libasound2t64" instead of the virtual package "libasound2" (BugFix) #2023
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
libasound2
is not a virtual package before noble (e.g. jammy), but it is in noble. Moreover, it seems like in the build for arm64 (currently it only happened on arm64 and if you search for "asound", you will find that it installed both packages on arm), snapcraft tried to package bothlibasound2t64
andliboss4-salsa-asound2
, which should no happened (I will create a bug for snapcraft). Since these 2 packages conflict each other, and actually what we want islibasound2t64
.Overall, I not only to try to workaround the snapcraft issue, but also think it is better to point out the package we want.
Resolved issues
#1885
Documentation
N/A
Tests
I build a checkbox24 with replacing
libasound2
withlibasound2t64
Before
After