Skip to content

Conversation

@rishikunnath2747
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR fixes the bug where the error handling for duplicate scenario and virus scenario was incorrect

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Gemini Automated Review
Summary of Changes

This commit removes the extraction of the objectId property from a JSON object within the formResponse method. The rationale for this removal is unclear and may introduce errors.

Best Practices Review

  • Potential Bug: Removal of objectId assignment without addressing its subsequent usage in the formResponse method. This will likely cause a runtime error (NullPointerException or similar).
  • Missing Error Handling: The code lacks try-catch blocks around JSON parsing, making it vulnerable to JSONExceptions.
  • Inconsistent Formatting: (Assuming inconsistent formatting based on the potential for this kind of oversight in a larger codebase. More information about the formatting would be needed to give a precise finding.)

Potential Bugs

  • Uninitialized variable objectId will be used in formResponse method, leading to a NullPointerException or similar.
  • Lack of error handling for JSON parsing may cause the application to crash if the JSON structure is unexpected or invalid.

Recommendations

  • Priority 1: If objectId is no longer needed, remove all references to it from the formResponse method. If it's still needed, reinstate the extraction of objectId from the succinctProperties JSON object.

  • Priority 1: Implement try-catch blocks to handle potential JSONExceptions when parsing the JSON response. For example:

try {
    JSONObject succinctProperties = formResponse.getJSONObject("succinctProperties");
    String objectId = succinctProperties.getString("objectId");
    // ... rest of the code ...
} catch (JSONException e) {
    // Log the error and handle it appropriately (e.g., return an error, use a default value, etc.)
    logger.error("Error parsing JSON response: ", e);
    return null; // Or throw a custom exception.
}
  • Priority 2: Review and ensure consistent formatting throughout the codebase. Consider using an automated formatter.

Quality Rating

4/10

Overall

The code change is risky and likely to introduce runtime errors. The lack of error handling is a serious concern. Addressing the uninitialized variable and adding proper exception handling is crucial before merging. The lack of information on formatting makes it hard to fully assess code quality.

@rishikunnath2747 rishikunnath2747 merged commit 832da90 into develop Sep 24, 2025
9 checks passed
@rishikunnath2747 rishikunnath2747 deleted the errorHandlingBug branch September 24, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants