You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The main idea is to constrain the set of operators depending on the type of the feature being processed at that branch. So, for example, if it is a categorical feature, it will only compare to equality with one of the allowed values. It does seem to be an early stage, but possibly it will intersect with brush eventually.
This one is my paper at gecco, even though it is about program synthesis, but it also implements type checks to constraint the program tree generation:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This paper is somehow related to the Brush project
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369615357_Domain-Aware_Feature_Learning_with_Grammar-Guided_Genetic_Programming
The main idea is to constrain the set of operators depending on the type of the feature being processed at that branch. So, for example, if it is a categorical feature, it will only compare to equality with one of the allowed values. It does seem to be an early stage, but possibly it will intersect with brush eventually.
This one is my paper at gecco, even though it is about program synthesis, but it also implements type checks to constraint the program tree generation:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03200
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions