"check for random user" may better be called "check for guest access"

[4elta]

... because, i guess, this is the ultimate goal of this test: verify whether a non-existing user is mapped to the guest account.
the scan results (text, JSON, CSV) should then also reflect that:
session : random_user --> session : guest_access

When we connected as a user that doesn’t exist, the server was aware of it so it implicitly falls back to the guest account of the domain.

-- https://sensepost.com/blog/2024/guest-vs-null-session-on-windows/

see also smb.conf: map to guest

i could prepare a PR with the required changes if you want me to.

salut 🙂

[4elta]

see #54

[cddmp]

Thanks for your pull request! I like how you want to name things in a precise way. I will have a look soon.

[4elta]

awesome! i'm looking forward working with you again 😉