How one can diagnose why rdns frequently drops to fallback DNS? #2274
Unanswered
onetimecontributor
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
|
The use of Configure -> Network -> Fallback DNS (which is really "Bootstrap DNS" used by Rethink itself) was not fully, totally, properly reported in versions prior to Frequent use of Fallback DNS is normal iff:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi! v0.5.5t, I observe unexpectedly high (more than 3/4 subjectively) amount of queries resolved by fallback DNS (coming from non-bypassed apps).
My config is as follows:
Apart from negative impact of nextDNS not applying my custom rules, it also increases load/costs on rethinkdns infra.
How can I diagnose the reason for such a behavior? What to look for in logs? On a screenshots I have sample logs for both falled back and expected behaviors when I try to run DNS leak tests on Surfshark web page (DNS resolved as expected via upstream) and on Mullvad web page (falling back to rethinkdns).
upstream nexdns:

fallback:

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions