License choice?

[nikaro]

Hello, would you mind explaining the license choice of FSL-1.1-MIT instead of a bare MIT? Do you plan to build a commercial product around Crush? In case it makes sense... Otherwise i don't see the purpose meanwhile a lot of other coding agents exists under FLOSS licenses.

My actual concern is that Crush cannot be packaged into many software repositories (Homebrew, Debian, ...).

[meowgorithm]

Hey! I understand the concern and appreciate the question. The intention is to for Crush to remain source available and easily adoptable internally, with a clear path to MIT, while allowing us to sustainably build a commercial product around it.

In other words, our goal is to keep development open and accessible while also making sure the project can be maintained long-term. We know that means it won’t fit every package repository, but we believe it's a fair trade-off.

I'm going to close this discussion in effort of tidiness, but please do chime in if you have more questions.