Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed up CI #2043

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Speed up CI #2043

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

sequencer
Copy link
Member

Contributor Checklist

  • Did you add Scaladoc to every public function/method?
  • Did you add at least one test demonstrating the PR?
  • Did you delete any extraneous printlns/debugging code?
  • Did you specify the type of improvement?
  • Did you add appropriate documentation in docs/src?
  • Did you state the API impact?
  • Did you specify the code generation impact?
  • Did you request a desired merge strategy?
  • Did you add text to be included in the Release Notes for this change?

Type of Improvement

API Impact

Backend Code Generation Impact

Desired Merge Strategy

Release Notes

Reviewer Checklist (only modified by reviewer)

  • Did you add the appropriate labels?
  • Did you mark the proper milestone (3.2.x, 3.3.x, 3.4.x, 3.5.0) ?
  • Did you review?
  • Did you check whether all relevant Contributor checkboxes have been checked?
  • Did you mark as Please Merge?

@sequencer
Copy link
Member Author

Reopen #2036 due to CI issue.

@sequencer
Copy link
Member Author

Test in Mac failed with verilator/verilator#3031
So just gave up Mac CI :(

@sequencer sequencer force-pushed the fast_test branch 4 times, most recently from 39166bc to 9f7e872 Compare August 18, 2021 06:22
@sequencer
Copy link
Member Author

@sequencer
Copy link
Member Author

Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:54:43 GMT
[info] ImplicitModule directly in a RawModule in an ImplicitModule
6626
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:54:43 GMT
Elaborating design...
6627
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:54:43 GMT
[info] - should fail
6628
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:40:57 GMT
[info] - Infering widths on huge Vecs should not cause a stack overflow
6629
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:40:57 GMT
Elaborating design...
6630
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:40:57 GMT
Done elaborating.

@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced by #2341

@jackkoenig jackkoenig closed this Sep 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants