-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added particle flow candidates to particle flow validation #29628
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-29628/15005
|
A new Pull Request was created by @chosila for master. It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/Configuration @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
PR description:
This PR adds PFCandidates (packedCandidates) to the particle flow validation package, as well as included some JetMET plots in the plotting script. The packedCandidates histograms can be found in the DQM files under ParticleFlow/Run summary/PackedCandidates.
our plotting script, found in RecoParticleFlow/test/compare.py was also changed to accommodate the changes in the DQM files.
PR validation:
http://hep.baylor.edu/chosila/PFVal/plots_JetMET_PFCand/
Shows the histograms made with compare.py and the DQM files made using the modified scrips in this PR. The sampled used in the plots were the same QCD sample, so it looks like only 1 sample is visible.
Were also ran in addition to the QCD samples, and produces the expected outputs with no failures.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This PR is not a backport.
@hatakeyamak @bendavid @juska