⚡️ Speed up function get_diff_lines_count by 19% in PR #274 (skip-formatting-for-large-diffs)
#278
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #274
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
skip-formatting-for-large-diffs.📄 19% (0.19x) speedup for
get_diff_lines_countincodeflash/code_utils/formatter.py⏱️ Runtime :
3.13 milliseconds→2.62 milliseconds(best of279runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is a much faster rewrite. The biggest bottleneck was constructing the entire
diff_lineslist just to count its length. Instead, loop directly through the lines and count matching lines, avoiding extra memory and function call overhead. This also removes the small overhead of the nested function.Optimizations made.
startswithwith a tuple.This reduces both runtime and memory usage by avoiding unnecessary data structures!
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr274-2025-06-03T21.03.54and push.