Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 19, 2025

📄 8% (0.08x) speedup for format_numeric_fields in datacompy/spark/helper.py

⏱️ Runtime : 397 milliseconds 366 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves an 8% speedup through two key changes that reduce Python overhead during DataFrame column processing:

1. Set-based membership testing: Changed numeric_types from a list to a set. The original code performed c[1] not in numeric_types checks 229 times according to the profiler. List membership testing is O(n) while set membership is O(1), making lookups significantly faster when checking data types.

2. Generator expression instead of list building: Replaced the explicit loop that builds a fixed_cols list with a generator expression that lazily computes column transformations. This eliminates the overhead of:

  • Multiple list.append() calls (229 total appends in the original)
  • Intermediate list storage
  • The explicit loop structure

The profiler results show the optimization's impact clearly - the original code spent significant time in the loop structure (lines with c[1] not in numeric_types, fixed_cols.append() calls), while the optimized version consolidates all the column processing logic into a single generator that's consumed directly by df.select().

The generator approach is particularly effective here because PySpark's select() method can consume the generator directly without materializing an intermediate list, reducing memory pressure and eliminating Python-level iteration overhead. This optimization is most beneficial for DataFrames with many columns, where the membership testing and list building costs accumulate significantly.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 7 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_spark/test_helper.py::test_format_numeric_fields 5.81ms 5.19ms 11.9%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-format_numeric_fields-mi5xgu5t and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization achieves an 8% speedup through two key changes that reduce Python overhead during DataFrame column processing:

**1. Set-based membership testing**: Changed `numeric_types` from a list to a set. The original code performed `c[1] not in numeric_types` checks 229 times according to the profiler. List membership testing is O(n) while set membership is O(1), making lookups significantly faster when checking data types.

**2. Generator expression instead of list building**: Replaced the explicit loop that builds a `fixed_cols` list with a generator expression that lazily computes column transformations. This eliminates the overhead of:
- Multiple `list.append()` calls (229 total appends in the original)
- Intermediate list storage
- The explicit loop structure

The profiler results show the optimization's impact clearly - the original code spent significant time in the loop structure (lines with `c[1] not in numeric_types`, `fixed_cols.append()` calls), while the optimized version consolidates all the column processing logic into a single generator that's consumed directly by `df.select()`.

The generator approach is particularly effective here because PySpark's `select()` method can consume the generator directly without materializing an intermediate list, reducing memory pressure and eliminating Python-level iteration overhead. This optimization is most beneficial for DataFrames with many columns, where the membership testing and list building costs accumulate significantly.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 November 19, 2025 11:37
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant