⚡️ Speed up function temp_column_name by 37%
#47
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 37% (0.37x) speedup for
temp_column_nameindatacompy/snowflake.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.40 milliseconds→1.03 milliseconds(best of15runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 36% speedup through two key optimizations:
1. Eliminated inefficient list concatenation
The original code used
columns = columns + list(dataframe.columns)inside a loop, which creates a new list object on each iteration. This is O(n²) behavior as lists grow. The optimized version initializescolumns = set()and usescolumns.update(dataframe.columns), which is O(n) and directly updates the set in-place.2. Streamlined loop logic
Removed the unnecessary
uniquevariable and simplified the while loop from a two-step check (if temp_column in columns: ... if unique:) to a single negated condition (if temp_column not in columns: return temp_column). This reduces the number of operations per iteration.Why this matters for performance:
inoperator) is O(1) vs O(n) for listsset.update()is more efficient than repeated list concatenationImpact on workloads:
Based on the function reference,
temp_column_name()is called during DataFrame merging operations in_dataframe_merge(), specifically when handling duplicate rows. This is likely a hot path during data comparison operations, so the 36% improvement will meaningfully reduce merge times.Test case insights:
The optimization shows consistent 10-25% improvements across most test cases, with particularly strong gains (199-263% faster) on large-scale scenarios with many DataFrames, where the O(n²) → O(n) column collection improvement is most pronounced.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_8h8xtkx8/tmpmch8wy6g/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_temp_column_nameTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-temp_column_name-mi6kvq29and push.