⚡️ Speed up method InteractiveMigrationQuestioner.ask_auto_now_add_addition by 15%
#121
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 15% (0.15x) speedup for
InteractiveMigrationQuestioner.ask_auto_now_add_additionindjango/db/migrations/questioner.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.50 milliseconds→1.30 milliseconds(best of435runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 15% speedup by reducing I/O overhead through batched output operations:
Key optimizations:
Batched writes in
_choice_input: Instead of 3-4 separatewrite()calls for the menu display, the code builds a list and joins it into a single write operation. This reduces I/O calls from ~4 to 1 per menu display.Batched banner output in
_ask_default: The initial instruction text (4 separate writes) is now collected in a list and output as one batched write, reducing I/O overhead.Pre-computed prompt string: The default prompt format is calculated once outside the input loop rather than being conditionally formatted on each iteration.
Why this is faster:
OutputWrapper.write()call has inherent overhead (method dispatch, string formatting, output flushing)join()is more efficient than multiple separate write callsself.prompt_output.write("\n".join(buf))) take proportionally less time than the sum of individual writes in the originalTest case performance:
The optimizations show consistent 2-11% improvements across all test cases, with the best gains on simpler cases that don't involve extensive user input loops (where I/O batching has maximum impact). Complex scenarios with many invalid inputs see smaller but still meaningful improvements since the menu display overhead is reduced.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-InteractiveMigrationQuestioner.ask_auto_now_add_addition-mh6oagq7and push.