⚡️ Speed up function convert_unix_timestamp by 11%
          #4
        
          
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
📄 11% (0.11x) speedup for
convert_unix_timestampinsrc/together/utils/tools.py⏱️ Runtime :
9.92 milliseconds→8.96 milliseconds(best of128runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces the expensive
strftime()method call with direct f-string formatting using datetime object attributes. Instead ofdt_object.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%fZ"), the code now usesf"{dt_object.year:04d}-{dt_object.month:02d}-{dt_object.day:02d}T{dt_object.hour:02d}:{dt_object.minute:02d}:{dt_object.second:02d}.{dt_object.microsecond:06d}Z".This provides a 10% overall speedup because:
strftime()must parse the format string"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%fZ"at runtime, while f-strings are compiled at parse timedt_object.year,dt_object.month, etc. is faster than the internal formatting logic instrftime()strftime()The line profiler shows the original
strftime()line consumed 73.4% of execution time (10.3ms out of 14.0ms total), making it the clear bottleneck. The optimized version spreads this work across multiple f-string operations that are collectively faster.Test case performance: The optimization shows consistent 30-60% speedup across individual test cases, with particularly strong gains (60-78%) on simple cases like epoch and basic timestamps. Even large-scale tests with 1000 iterations show 9-13% improvements, demonstrating the optimization scales well for batch processing scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_atws5rsq/tmpu0h3d5ga/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_convert_unix_timestampTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-convert_unix_timestamp-mgzqzpf1and push.