Skip to content

Conversation

bact
Copy link
Contributor

@bact bact commented Oct 1, 2025

Also make SPDX 2.3 and SPDX 3.0 page name consistent to each other

Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
@progval
Copy link
Member

progval commented Oct 1, 2025

I'd rather use "SBOM" for both, because "fields" does not describe anything specific to SPDX (all formats have fields)

@bact
Copy link
Contributor Author

bact commented Oct 1, 2025

Thank you. Fixed as suggested.

@progval progval merged commit 5a01ec6 into codemeta:master Oct 1, 2025
1 check passed
progval added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2025
@progval
Copy link
Member

progval commented Oct 1, 2025

Note that this PR depends on the new crosswalk data after the merge of codemeta/codemeta#429 (+ regeneration of the crosswalk.csv)

Oops I missed this.

@bact bact deleted the add-spdx3 branch October 1, 2025 07:57
@progval progval mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025
@bact bact restored the add-spdx3 branch October 1, 2025 08:01
@bact bact mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants