Skip to content

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link

@depfu depfu bot commented Nov 29, 2017

⚠️ No CI detected ⚠️

You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!

Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.

This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:

  • Our friends at Travis-CI provide excellent service.
  • Circle CI are good, too, and have a free plan that will cover basic needs.
  • If you use something like Jenkins, make sure that you're using the Github integration correctly so that it reports status data back to Github.
  • If you have already set up a CI for this repository, you might need to check your configuration. Make sure it will run on all new branches. If you don’t want it to run on every branch, you can whitelist branches starting with depfu/.

It might be necessary to once deactivate and reactivate your project in Depfu for the CI service to be properly detected.



We've updated a dependency and here is what you need to know:

gem name version specification old version new version
rspec-rails 3.7.1 3.7.2

You should probably take a good look at the info here and the test results before merging this pull request, of course.

What changed?

✳️ rspec-rails (3.7.1 → 3.7.2) · Repo · Changelog

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 15 commits:


Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Nov 29, 2017
@coder2000 coder2000 merged commit fdaf46f into master Dec 20, 2017
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/rspec-rails-3.7.2 branch December 20, 2017 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants