🔧 Add CODEOWNERS

[NatoBoram]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated repository administration settings.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two entries were added to the CODEOWNERS configuration file to assign code ownership responsibilities. This is a metadata update to define maintainers for repository sections and pull request review assignments.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CODEOWNERS configuration .github/CODEOWNERS	Added two ownership entries assigning code review responsibility and maintainer roles

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Verify that the assigned users are appropriate repository maintainers
• Confirm the ownership entries align with repository structure and team responsibilities

Poem

🐰 A files are claimed, the paths now defined,
Two keepers appointed to review and mind,
The code flows cleaner, responsibilities set,
With CODEOWNERS marked, no confusion yet! 🌿

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding a CODEOWNERS file with ownership assignments.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/CODEOWNERS

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/CODEOWNERS (1)

1-2: Consider consolidating duplicate wildcard patterns.

Both lines use the * pattern, which assigns ownership for all files. These can be combined into a single line for better clarity and maintainability.

Apply this diff to consolidate the entries:

-* @helizaga
-* @NatoBoram
+* @helizaga @NatoBoram

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbb7cc3 and b040f69.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔍 Remote MCP Exa, Linear

Great! I have gathered comprehensive context. Let me now provide a focused summary of the relevant information for this PR review.

Summary of Context for PR Review

What is CODEOWNERS?

CODEOWNERS is a GitHub feature that allows you to define individuals or teams that are responsible for code in a repository. Code owners are automatically requested for review when someone opens a pull request that modifies code that they own.

Key Benefits for the Repository

1. Code Quality & Security: CODEOWNERS ensures that experienced and knowledgeable team members review critical code changes, which helps maintain code quality and security.

2. Streamlined Review Process: CODEOWNERS simplifies the code review process by automatically requesting reviews from designated owners when changes are made to specific paths, ensuring that the right people are notified without manual intervention.

3. Accountability: Assigning code ownership fosters a sense of accountability among team members, making individuals more likely to ensure their sections remain robust and well-maintained.

Technical Implementation

The CODEOWNERS file typically resides in the .github directory (or docs directory) and follows specific syntax that allows specification of ownership rules for files and directories. Basic format includes file patterns followed by one or more owners (users or teams).

Repository Context from Linear

The Linear search revealed a related discussion in issue ENG-953 "Improve assigning reviewers" which discusses GitHub's CODEOWNERS feature as a standard practice but notes that CodeRabbit uses AI-native workflow for reviewer prediction based on previous PR context rather than relying solely on CODEOWNERS configuration.

---

****, ****, ****, ****