📝 Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct

[NatoBoram]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added Contributor Code of Conduct to establish community standards, define acceptable behaviors, and outline enforcement procedures for community participation.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file is added to the repository containing the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct version 2.1, which establishes community standards, unacceptable behaviors, enforcement responsibilities, and escalation procedures for policy violations.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
New Code of Conduct CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md	Introduces Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct v2.1 with pledge, standards, unacceptable/acceptable behaviors, enforcement responsibilities, scope, processes, and escalation guidelines (Correction → Warning → Temporary Ban → Permanent Ban)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Quick skim to verify document completeness and alignment with project practices

Poem

🐰 A conduct of kindness, now written in stone,
Where civility thrives in our digital home,
With standards so clear and a covenant true,
We hop toward harmony—a community new! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding a Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct document to the repository.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/CODE_OF_CONDUCT

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (2)

1-83: Consider adopting Contributor Covenant v3.0 instead of v2.1.

Per the external tools findings, Contributor Covenant version 3.0 was released in 2025 as the next evolution, incorporating improvements through collaboration with industry experts in community governance. While v2.1 is stable and widely adopted, v3.0 may offer enhanced language and guidance for modern open-source communities.

Please review the differences between v2.1 and v3.0 to determine if upgrading would better serve your community's needs. You can find v3.0 at the Contributor Covenant website.

---

1-83: Excellent addition of a comprehensive Code of Conduct.

The document is well-structured and clearly establishes community expectations. The pledge is inclusive, the standards are reasonable and balanced, and the enforcement guidelines provide a clear escalation ladder with defined consequences. This aligns well with open-source best practices and signals a commitment to a welcoming community.

A few follow-up suggestions for adoption success (not blockers):

• Link or reference this Code of Conduct from CONTRIBUTING.md or README.md to maximize discoverability
• Consider documenting internal procedures for how maintainers will handle reports, separate from this public-facing document
• Ensure all maintainers are aligned on enforcement expectations

Once you finalize the contact email and version considerations, would you like help integrating references to this Code of Conduct into other community documents?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77738c4 and 93e808d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

[style] ~22-~22: Try using a synonym here to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ind - Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks - Pu...

(COMMENT_REMARK)

🔍 Remote MCP

Summary of Relevant Context for PR #7 Code of Conduct Review

Key Information Found:

Contributor Covenant Overview [::Exa::]

Contributor Covenant is the most widely adopted open source code of conduct in the world, and has always promoted the belief that everyone benefits when implicit values are made explicit. A code of conduct defines standards for how to engage in a community and signals an inclusive environment that respects all contributions.

Current Covenant Version Available

The search results show that Contributor Covenant 3.0 was released in 2025, representing the next stage in evolution through collaboration with industry experts in community governance and code of conduct enforcement. The PR adds version 2.1, which is an earlier but still widely-used version.

Implementation Best Practices [::Exa::]

Before adopting a code of conduct for your project, research different codes of conduct designed for open source projects and consider carefully whether you are willing and able to enforce it. Creating a code of conduct involves several steps, including defining goals and scope, researching existing codes of conduct, drafting the document, reviewing and approving the document, publishing and communicating the code of conduct, and regularly reviewing and updating the document.

Adoption Success Factor

Adopter Covenant signals your commitment to creating a welcoming and safe environment for everyone, and many communities that have adopted Contributor Covenant include well-known organizations like Active Admin, Airbnb, and Algorithm Archive.

Linear Context [::Linear::]

The Linear search did not return any issues or documents specifically related to a Code of Conduct for the git-worktree-runner project, indicating this PR may be a new initiative for community governance.

Review Consideration Points:

• The PR adds a comprehensive policy document based on an established standard (Contributor Covenant v2.1)
• Low estimated review effort aligns with the policy-focused nature (no code changes)
• No project-specific enforcement procedures are yet documented in Linear, which may be worth considering as a follow-up after adoption

🔇 Additional comments (1)

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)

39-39: The review comment is based on an incorrect assumption about project ownership.

The repository is officially maintained by the CodeRabbit organization (coderabbitai), as evidenced by:

• The GitHub repository URL: https://github.com/coderabbitai/git-worktree-runner.git
• The CODEOWNERS file listing @helizaga and @NatoBoram (CodeRabbit maintainers)
• The project structure and governance model

Using support@coderabbit.ai as the Code of Conduct enforcement contact is entirely appropriate for a CodeRabbit-maintained project. The original review's concern about the email "appearing to be a CodeRabbit company email rather than project-specific" is based on the flawed premise that this is an independent community project—it is not.

No changes are needed to CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md in response to this concern.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.