🔖 v1.0.0

[NatoBoram]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a comprehensive CHANGELOG with an Unreleased section and detailed 1.0.0 (2025-11-14) release notes covering features, enhancements, and guidance.
  • Updated the README: converted caution notes to admonitions, clarified headings and labels, improved wording in several sections, adjusted a few code fence languages/titles, and made minor punctuation and formatting tweaks.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new CHANGELOG.md with an Unreleased section and detailed 1.0.0 release notes (2025-11-14). Updates README.md formatting and wording: replaces inline cautions with admonitions, adjusts headings, minor wording and code-fence changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Changelog CHANGELOG.md	New changelog documenting Unreleased (empty) and a detailed 1.0.0 release entry dated 2025-11-14 covering features, enhancements, adapters, hooks, packaging, completions, diagnostics, configuration, worktree details, and comparison links.
Documentation edits README.md	Formatting and copy changes: replace inline caution notes with admonition-style blockquotes, reword headings/labels to use TIP/IMPORTANT/WARNING prefixes, minor punctuation and code-fence language updates, and small example/text tweaks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagram generated — changes are documentation-only and do not modify control flow.)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Check changelog formatting, dates, and comparison links in CHANGELOG.md.
• Verify README admonition syntax renders correctly in target renderer and that code fences specify appropriate languages.
• Confirm no unintended content or broken links introduced in either file.

Poem

🐰 I scratched a log of every feat,

New pages neat and tidy, sweet.
Version one, a hop and drum—
Notes laid out, the rabbits come! 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title '🔖 v1.0.0' is vague and lacks descriptive content about the actual changes made in the pull request.	Consider using a more descriptive title that summarizes the main changes, such as 'Release v1.0.0: Add CHANGELOG and update README with admonitions' to better communicate the scope of modifications.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch release/v1.0.0

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

619-619: Code fence language identifier is a reasonable improvement. Adding log as the language hint to the directory tree structure (line 619) aids syntax highlighting on compatible renderers. If consistency is desired across similar tree structures elsewhere, consider applying the same label throughout the documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 190ef4c and be2324b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (6 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔍 Remote MCP Context7, Exa, Linear

Relevant context found (concise)

• No project-specific docs or Linear issues tied to coderabbitai/git-worktree-runner or PR #8 were found. Linear search returned only general Linear docs (no repo/PR-specific items).

• Exa code/web searches found related git-worktree CLI projects and docs (useful for feature/behavior expectations but not specific to this repo):

  • A detailed CLI "claude-worktree" documentation page showing common commands/UX for worktree tools (new/finish/list/status/prune/sync/doctor, shell completions, templates, stash management). Useful as a comparison for features declared in the CHANGELOG/README.
  • Other worktree managers and CodeRabbit / CodeRabbit docs (changelog, platform docs) surfaced but not repo-specific release notes for git-worktree-runner.

• Context7 lookup for "coderabbitai/git-worktree-runner" failed due to an unauthorized API key (couldn't retrieve library docs). If you want Context7 documentation searched, an API key fix is needed.

Sources/tools used: Exa_get_code_context_exa, Exa_web_search_exa, Linear_search_documentation, Context7_resolve-library-id (unauthorized).

🔇 Additional comments (2)

README.md (2)

269-270: Admonitions are well-placed and properly formatted. The conversion to GitHub-flavored Markdown admonitions ([!IMPORTANT], [!WARNING], [!TIP]) improves visual hierarchy and readability. Security guidance at line 337 (warning about sensitive files) is appropriately prominent and timely for a 1.0.0 release.

Also applies to: 337-338, 511-512

---

702-702: Closing section provides a friendly release-ready tone. The new "## Happy coding with worktrees! 🚀" section at line 702 is an appropriate capstone for v1.0.0 documentation, reinforcing the project's user-friendly positioning.