Skip to content

Conversation

tilsammans
Copy link
Contributor

It seems this can be optimised this way, or am I not understanding something?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 13, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 97.713% when pulling 07a8163 on scrollytelling:entries-css-reduce-loops into 2249619 on codevise:master.

@tf
Copy link
Member

tf commented Jul 13, 2016

I guess you are right. Still not completely sure if the order of CSS rules could be important here. I'll check and report back.

@tilsammans
Copy link
Contributor Author

This one is from July and seems pretty small, chance it can go in before I need to rebase?

@tf tf merged commit 11b95b1 into codevise:master Nov 17, 2016
@tilsammans tilsammans deleted the entries-css-reduce-loops branch November 17, 2016 10:55
@tf
Copy link
Member

tf commented Nov 17, 2016

Yeah, sorry for the delay. Been meaning to test this and did not get around to it. CSS changes with possible consequences on rule precedence always make me scared. But this should be fine.

@tf tf added this to the v0.12 milestone Nov 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants