Skip to content

Conversation

@ForNeVeR
Copy link
Member

According to #19 I am starting my work through assembler. It will become more feature-rich in future (the next big thing should be the macro subsystem while it may take a few additional steps to add some of the missing instructions), but that't the first little step.

Also I've renamed all the executable assemblies to use the more appropriate names (Naggum.Compiler, Naggum.Interactive). I think we'll create a platform-dependent convenience scripts with shorter names in future (nga, ngc and ngi trinity would be nice).

@ForNeVeR
Copy link
Member Author

@gsomix, the rebase is done, please take a look at this.

@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR changed the title [WIP] Naggum.Assembler Naggum.Assembler Dec 26, 2015
@ForNeVeR
Copy link
Member Author

ForNeVeR commented Jan 2, 2016

I've rebased these changes against latest develop, and now this PR have no CRLF conversion. It contains only relevant changes now.

@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2016
@ForNeVeR
Copy link
Member Author

ForNeVeR commented Jan 4, 2016

Well, I'll review it myself. Sorry, mr. @gsomix, but we need to move on with that. I hope you'll be able to catch up new pull requests later.

@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR assigned ForNeVeR and unassigned gsomix Jan 4, 2016
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we really add method overload resolution here? I doubt: here the user has written the method exactly as he wants it to be resolved, without any compiler-involved resolution step.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please define argument types for public API.

ForNeVeR added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2016
Assembler: initial implementation.
@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR merged commit dac0164 into develop Jan 4, 2016
@ForNeVeR ForNeVeR deleted the feature/nga branch January 4, 2016 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants