Fixed an invalid argument configuration

[MSeal]

Fixes #2098

Converts the arguments to keyword args to avoid ordering issues with class definition.

Checklist

• Contains customer facing changes? Including API/behavior changes
• Did you add sufficient unit test and/or integration test coverage for this PR?
  • If not, please explain why it is not required

References

JIRA:

Test & Review

Open questions / Follow-ups

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes an invalid argument configuration in the RegisteredSchema constructor by converting positional arguments to keyword arguments, addressing an argument ordering issue that was causing errors.

• Converted RegisteredSchema constructor calls from positional to keyword arguments
• Added a test case to verify the register_schema_full_response method works correctly
• Removed a trailing comma in a RegisteredSchema constructor call

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
src/confluent_kafka/schema_registry/_async/schema_registry_client.py	Fixed RegisteredSchema constructor calls to use keyword arguments instead of positional arguments
tests/schema_registry/_async/test_api_client.py	Added test case for register_schema_full_response method to ensure proper functionality

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[confluent-cla-assistant]

🎉 All Contributor License Agreements have been signed. Ready to merge.
_{Please push an empty commit if you would like to re-run the checks to verify CLA status for all contributors.}

[pbabics]

👋 it is also here - https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-python/blob/master/src/confluent_kafka/schema_registry/_async/schema_registry_client.py#L670

[MSeal]

@pbabics thanks, I forgot to run the unasync command to update the generated code. The semaphore build also referenced this change was missing.

[fangnx]

LGTM other than the unit test comments. Thank you for the quick fix!

[fangnx]

Should this line be removed?

[MSeal]

No, it's intended to force the cache load of an already registered schema for the test

[fangnx]

Same

[sonarqube-confluent]

Analysis Details

2 Issues

• 0 Bugs
• 0 Vulnerabilities
• 2 Code Smells

Coverage and Duplications

• 100.00% Coverage (66.90% Estimated after merge)
• No duplication information (4.90% Estimated after merge)

Project ID: confluent-kafka-python

View in SonarQube