Skip to content

Conversation

@mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Jul 24, 2025

As the title says

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 24, 2025
RELEASE_NOTES.md Outdated
- When creating `podman machine` VMs on Windows using the WSL v2 provider, images are now pulled as artifacts from `quay.io/podman/machine-os`, matching the behavior of other VM providers.
- Signal forwarding done by the `--sig-proxy` option to `podman run` and `podman attach` is now more robust to races and no longer forwards the `SIGSTOP` signal.
- The `podman system check --quick` command now skips checking layer digests.
- Containers in networks with DNS enabled via `aardvark-dns` now append include the host's search domains in `/etc/resolv.conf` ([#24713](https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/24713)).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't we already fix this in v5.5.1?

  • Fixed a bug where containers joined to a network with DNS enabled would not include the host's search domains in their resolv.conf (#24713).

So this should not be mentioned on 5.6 again.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a vote against the new logic for identifying what gets a release note. I'll remove it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you need a way to check what has been backported and released in a prior patch release already and then skip it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I previously relied on a manual check of commits in the old vs new branches by hash, and then did a further substring check for exact matches of commit subject to try and identify cherry-picks. This time, I switched to git cherry to try and replace both, because the substring bit was inexact and worried me that it'd eliminate real release notes. Evidently I need to look into re-adding the substring check.

Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
@mheon mheon force-pushed the release_notes_560_rc1 branch from 2b570ce to e22fc65 Compare July 25, 2025 12:20
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Jul 25, 2025

Comments addressed & re-pushed

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Jul 25, 2025

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL and merge

Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5, Luap99, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@lsm5
Copy link
Member

lsm5 commented Jul 25, 2025

testing-farm rawhide failed on subids, so I guess we gotta get testing-farm to build new images once the shadow utils change is reverted.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4414b24 into containers:v5.6 Jul 25, 2025
34 of 36 checks passed
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Oct 24, 2025
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants