Skip to content

Conversation

@sarahlwelton
Copy link
Contributor

Not much I can do about the "field" 3 times in a sentence but we're trying out here.

@sarahlwelton sarahlwelton self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Rebecca-Martinez007 Rebecca-Martinez007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of comments! Let me know if I misunderstood something, and I'll come and approve because the rest LGTM.

. (Optional) Create another child field on the new collection type mapping for any additional fields you want to return in your search results.
+
For example, you could add the text field that you used to generate your vector embeddings.
For more information about how to create child fields, see xref:search:create-child-field.adoc[].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
For more information about how to create child fields, see xref:search:create-child-field.adoc[].

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is a repeated sentence? You have this sentence on line 85.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, I want this here, too, since they need to create another child field in this step, too.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok noted.

+
For more information about how to create type mappings, see xref:search:create-type-mapping.adoc[].
. Create a child field mapping on the new collection type mapping:
.. In the *Field* field, enter the name of the field in your documents that contains your vector embeddings.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
.. In the *Field* field, enter the name of the field in your documents that contains your vector embeddings.
.. In *Field*, enter the name of the field in your documents that contains your vector embeddings.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original sentence is fine. I included this in the review because I wanted to try another option to reduce the number of "fields", but again, just a suggestion!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I considered that, but then it loses parity with the rest of the sentences and feels strange to me.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problem, I'll go approve!

Copy link
Contributor

@Rebecca-Martinez007 Rebecca-Martinez007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments were discussed - the changes LGTM!

@sarahlwelton sarahlwelton merged commit e1183ec into release/7.6 Nov 19, 2024
@sarahlwelton sarahlwelton deleted the DOC-12001-clarify-vs-ui-procedure branch November 19, 2024 15:55
sarahlwelton added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
…complaint. (#294)

* [DOC-12001] Moving some links around to try and resolve the original complaint.

* [DOC-12001] Removing the extra link out after some thought.
sarahlwelton added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
…complaint. (#294)

* [DOC-12001] Moving some links around to try and resolve the original complaint.

* [DOC-12001] Removing the extra link out after some thought.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants