Skip to content

Conversation

@SeijiEmery
Copy link
Member

Merged crawler implementation built out in the ucsc-crawler repo

…de a typo and mixed up the 249B description with 249A.... (everything else was quite trivial)
(note: I should probably just refactor the parsing stuff out and write
thorough unittests. But that takes so long... ≥_≤)
@SeijiEmery SeijiEmery merged commit 50f64d9 into development Jul 19, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 109

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 105: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 4
Relevant Lines: 4

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants