Skip to content

Conversation

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja commented Mar 20, 2023

Some reading may consider that "the lifetime of e has begun and not ended" can be interferred by the creation of the new object. It seems better to clarify that the condition only applies to the state immediately before the creation, and there should be no logical circular dependency on [basic.life]/1.5.

(Not sure whether the bullet should be applied to simultaneous implicit object creations.)

(Attempted to fix) cplusplus/CWG#247.

There should be no logical circular dependency.
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Aug 5, 2024

I'm not sure we want to do this editorially. @jensmaurer, should we leave this with CWG?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Any adjustments in this area are not editorial.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Aug 5, 2024
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Aug 5, 2024

Please engage with CWG on this issue.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe closed this Aug 5, 2024
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the providing-storage branch August 6, 2024 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants