[FIX] Missing trial_types are not added to a model specification / fixes #197

[marcobarilari]

fix #197, this way the .mat files contains only the trial_type entries that are present in the events file. This way if eg responses are missing, they will not be put in the model.

(I have created this pr from the submodule of my analysis repo, it is the first so let me know if this way is correct)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #210 (6240998) into dev (64b24bc) will increase coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #210      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.20%   45.36%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          96       96              
  Lines        1701     1706       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          769      774       +5     
  Misses        932      932              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/subject_level/createAndReturnOnsetFile.m	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/subject_level/convertOnsetTsvToMat.m	90.62% <100.00%> (+1.73%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64b24bc...6240998. Read the comment docs.

[Remi-Gau]

Cool. This looks good.

Let me update the test to make sure this thing behaves like we hope it should.

(I have created this pr from the submodule of my analysis repo, it is the first so let me know if this way is correct)

I tend to often do that.

This is is fine by me but I think only collaborators on the upstream repo will be able to do that. Not a big issue I think.

[Remi-Gau]

LGTM

Will add a test. :-)