BIDS results #55
BIDS results #55
Conversation
Constrast spec update
- create basic test to validate json model files - add demo output to gitignore
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | |||
| function test_modelFiles() | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a very ugly test but it might let us know when we get some weird failure when the json model files are not properly formated
|
|
||
| spm_jobman('run',matlabbatch) | ||
|
|
||
| % move ps file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally we might want to rename each file that is created to make it easier to know which one is which when uploading to neurovault.
getOption.m
Outdated
| % opt.taskName = 'visMotion'; | ||
|
|
||
| % opt.taskName = 'balloonanalogrisktask'; | ||
| opt.taskName = 'balloonanalogrisktask'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should I move all the information related to this dataset (ds001 on open neuro) out of getOption and use that to replace the current getOption template we have?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it doesnt really matter. Any example that is avaialbe is good for the new user, and they will always have to change the taskName anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK I will update the template then.
|
One thing we might want to do is to check to clean the getOption file to make it easier to read for the workshop as now it has a lot of commented part that are cluttering the readability. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ | |||
| function BIDS_Results(FFXSmoothing, ConSmoothing, opt, isMVPA) | |||
| % This scripts computes the results for a series of contrast that can be | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How is that different from the FFX or RFX script which should compute the same thing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry the help section is really unhelpful here: this script actually does all the stuff that the user one would need to do when clicking Results on the GUI interface.
The other nice thing is that this allows to easily display the same results for all subjects of group rather than having to do that by hand.
2 participants
This a small addition to get the results of a given contrasts via scripting instead of via the GUI.
This also allows the implementation of exporting results using the NIDM format that greatly facilitates uploading results to neurovault.
This refers to issue #52