Skip to content

Conversation

@lodewiges
Copy link
Contributor

@lodewiges lodewiges commented Nov 17, 2025

Checklist

  • merged database migrations into 1 database migration
  • tested database migrations from origin/staging (git checkout staging ; git pull ; bundle exec rails db:reset ; git checkout BRANCH ; bundle exec rails db:migrate)

Summary

Shortly summarize the changes in this pull request. Does it concern changes in the UI, add some screenshots. Are there related issues solved? Please, mention them (with 'fixes #xyz', see https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests), so they can be resolved automatically when merging this pull request.

Other information

If there is some other relavent and imporant information for this pull request, mention it here. For example, related pull requests (also in amber-api) or newly introduced conventions, packages or other dependencies.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository configuration to standardize line ending handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Walkthrough

A .gitattributes configuration file is introduced to standardize line endings across the repository, enforcing LF (Unix-style) line endings for all text files using the * text=auto eol=lf rule.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Repository Configuration
.gitattributes
New file that enforces LF line endings for all text files via text=auto eol=lf rule

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Line endings, now aligned and true,
LF for all, no CRLF in view,
Consistency hopping through every file,
.gitattributes brings order and style! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description uses only the template structure without providing actual content; it leaves all sections as placeholder text without filling in required information. Replace placeholder text with concrete details: summarize the .gitattributes changes, explain why LF enforcement is needed, and fill in any relevant issue references or additional context.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'generate file to force LF' is directly related to the main change: introducing .gitattributes to enforce LF line endings.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/createLFRequiment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.gitattributes (1)

1-2: Consider expanding the configuration to explicitly exclude binary files.

The current rule * text=auto eol=lf is broad and applies to all files, including potential binary files. While text=auto provides some safety by detecting binary content, a more defensive approach would explicitly exclude or define binary file patterns to prevent unintended consequences.

Common improvements:

  • Add explicit binary file patterns (images, archives, compiled objects, etc.)
  • Clarify handling of vendored dependencies or auto-generated files
  • Test the change on an existing repository to verify it doesn't cause unexpected file modifications

For example:

* text=auto eol=lf

# Binary files
*.png binary
*.jpg binary
*.gif binary
*.zip binary
*.jar binary

Additionally, if Windows developers are on the team, consider documenting any setup steps (e.g., git config core.safecrlf warn) to avoid conflicts during the transition.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a13b1e and ba9b45d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .gitattributes (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: Lint
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.gitattributes (1)

1-2: Good practice to enforce consistent line endings across the repository.

Standardizing on LF line endings is a solid practice for projects, especially those targeting Unix/Linux deployments. The .gitattributes rule is syntactically correct.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.92%. Comparing base (8743725) to head (ba9b45d).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging     #596   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.92%   99.92%           
========================================
  Files          197      197           
  Lines         2658     2665    +7     
========================================
+ Hits          2656     2663    +7     
  Misses           2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lodewiges lodewiges merged commit 4df46de into staging Nov 17, 2025
6 checks passed
@lodewiges lodewiges deleted the feature/createLFRequiment branch November 17, 2025 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants