Commit d5b0e06
Peter Zijlstra
u64_stats,lockdep: Fix u64_stats_init() vs lockdep
Jakub reported that:
static struct net_device *rtl8139_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
...
u64_stats_init(&tp->rx_stats.syncp);
u64_stats_init(&tp->tx_stats.syncp);
...
}
results in lockdep getting confused between the RX and TX stats lock.
This is because u64_stats_init() is an inline calling seqcount_init(),
which is a macro using a static variable to generate a lockdep class.
By wrapping that in an inline, we negate the effect of the macro and
fold the static key variable, hence the confusion.
Fix by also making u64_stats_init() a macro for the case where it
matters, leaving the other case an inline for argument validation
etc.
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: "Erhard F." <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEXicy6+9MksdLZh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net1 parent 50bf808 commit d5b0e06
1 file changed
+4
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
115 | 115 | | |
116 | 116 | | |
117 | 117 | | |
| 118 | + | |
| 119 | + | |
| 120 | + | |
118 | 121 | | |
119 | 122 | | |
120 | | - | |
121 | | - | |
122 | | - | |
123 | 123 | | |
| 124 | + | |
124 | 125 | | |
125 | 126 | | |
126 | 127 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments