fix: Init resource relationships visualization #217
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new React components and enhancements to the visualization of resource relationships within a flow diagram. Key additions include the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx (2)
6-10: Consider adding error boundaries for robust error handling.Since this is an async component fetching data, it would be beneficial to wrap it with an error boundary to gracefully handle runtime errors and provide a better user experience.
Example implementation:
import { ErrorBoundary } from '~/components/ErrorBoundary'; export default async function VisualizePage({ params: { targetId }, }: { params: { targetId: string }; }) { return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Error loading visualization</div>}> {/* existing component content */} </ErrorBoundary> ); }
16-21: Consider adding loading state handling.Since this is an async component, it would be beneficial to show a loading state while data is being fetched. Next.js provides built-in loading.tsx for this purpose.
Create a loading.tsx in the same directory:
// loading.tsx export default function Loading() { return <div>Loading resource visualization...</div>; }apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/DeploymentNode.tsx (2)
6-7: Consider enhancing type safety and prop namingThe component could benefit from explicit type definitions and more descriptive parameter naming.
Consider this improvement:
-export const DeploymentNode: React.FC<NodeProps> = (node) => { - const { data } = node; +type DeploymentNodeData = { + label: string; + // Add other expected data properties +}; + +export const DeploymentNode: React.FC<NodeProps<DeploymentNodeData>> = (props) => { + const { data } = props;
17-35: Improve style consistency and reduce duplicationThe Handle components mix inline styles with Tailwind classes and contain duplicate styling.
Consider consolidating the styles:
+const HANDLE_STYLES = { + base: "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-amber-500", + common: { + background: colors.neutral[800], + }, + bottom: { + bottom: "0", + left: "50%", + transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", + }, +} as const; - <Handle - type="target" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-amber-500" - style={{ - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} - position={Position.Top} - /> + <Handle + type="target" + className={HANDLE_STYLES.base} + style={HANDLE_STYLES.common} + position={Position.Top} + /> <Handle type="source" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-amber-500" - style={{ - bottom: "0", - left: "50%", - transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} + className={HANDLE_STYLES.base} + style={{...HANDLE_STYLES.common, ...HANDLE_STYLES.bottom}} position={Position.Bottom} />apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/EnvironmentNode.tsx (4)
1-5: Optimize tailwindcss colors import for better tree-shakingInstead of importing all colors, import only the specific colors needed (green and neutral).
-import colors from "tailwindcss/colors"; +import { green, neutral } from "tailwindcss/colors";
6-7: Add type safety for the data propConsider defining an interface for the expected shape of the
dataprop to improve type safety and documentation.+interface EnvironmentNodeData { + label: string; + // Add other expected properties +} + -export const EnvironmentNode: React.FC<NodeProps> = (node) => { +export const EnvironmentNode: React.FC<NodeProps<EnvironmentNodeData>> = (node) => { const { data } = node;
9-16: Consider improving layout flexibilityThe current implementation has some potential layout concerns:
- Fixed width of 250px might truncate long labels
- Small text sizes (text-xs, text-sm) might affect readability
Consider these improvements:
-<div className="relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3"> +<div className="relative flex min-w-[250px] max-w-[350px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3"> <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> <IconPlant className="h-4 w-4 text-green-500" /> - <span className="text-xs">Environment</span> + <span className="text-sm font-medium">Environment</span> </div> - <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> + <div className="text-sm truncate" title={data.label}>{data.label}</div>
17-35: Improve style consistency and reusabilityThe Handle components mix Tailwind classes with inline styles. Consider extracting common styles and using Tailwind consistently.
+const handleCommonClasses = "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800"; + <Handle type="target" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500" - style={{ - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} + className={handleCommonClasses} position={Position.Top} /> <Handle type="source" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500" + className={`${handleCommonClasses} translate-y-1/2 -bottom-px left-1/2 -translate-x-1/2`} - style={{ - bottom: "0", - left: "50%", - transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} position={Position.Bottom} />apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/SystemNode.tsx (4)
1-5: Consider reordering imports following common conventions.Consider organizing imports in this order:
- External libraries (reactflow)
- UI libraries (@tabler/icons-react)
- Style/configuration imports (tailwindcss/colors)
-import type { NodeProps } from "reactflow"; -import { IconCategory } from "@tabler/icons-react"; -import { Handle, Position } from "reactflow"; -import colors from "tailwindcss/colors"; +import { Handle, Position } from "reactflow"; +import type { NodeProps } from "reactflow"; +import { IconCategory } from "@tabler/icons-react"; +import colors from "tailwindcss/colors";
6-7: Enhance type safety for data prop.Consider defining a specific type for the
dataprop to make it clear what properties are expected.+interface SystemNodeData { + label: string; +} + -export const SystemNode: React.FC<NodeProps> = (node) => { +export const SystemNode: React.FC<NodeProps<SystemNodeData>> = (node) => { const { data } = node;
9-16: Consider making the component more configurable and i18n-ready.A few suggestions to improve flexibility:
- Make the width configurable through props
- Extract the "System" text for internationalization
- Consider making the icon configurable
+interface SystemNodeData { + label: string; + width?: string; + systemLabel?: string; + icon?: React.ComponentType<{ className?: string }>; +} + export const SystemNode: React.FC<NodeProps<SystemNodeData>> = (node) => { - const { data } = node; + const { data: { label, width = "250px", systemLabel = "System", icon: Icon = IconCategory } } = node; return ( <> - <div className="relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-neutral-600 bg-neutral-900/30 px-4 py-3"> + <div className={`relative flex w-[${width}] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-neutral-600 bg-neutral-900/30 px-4 py-3`}> <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> - <IconCategory className="h-4 w-4 text-neutral-500" /> - <span className="text-xs">System</span> + <Icon className="h-4 w-4 text-neutral-500" /> + <span className="text-xs">{systemLabel}</span> </div> - <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> + <div className="text-sm">{label}</div>
17-35: Improve handle styling consistency and reusability.Consider extracting handle styles to a common configuration and using Tailwind classes for transforms.
+const handleStyles = { + className: "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500", + style: { background: colors.neutral[800] }, +}; + export const SystemNode: React.FC<NodeProps<SystemNodeData>> = (node) => { // ... return ( <> {/* ... */} <Handle type="target" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500" - style={{ - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} + {...handleStyles} position={Position.Top} /> <Handle type="source" - className="h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500" + {...handleStyles} + className={`${handleStyles.className} -bottom-1 left-1/2 -translate-x-1/2 translate-y-1/2`} - style={{ - bottom: "0", - left: "50%", - transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", - background: colors.neutral[800], - }} position={Position.Bottom} />apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx (2)
16-24: Consider simplifying the getBezierPath call.The function parameters can be passed directly from the destructured props without re-destructuring.
- const [edgePath, labelX, labelY] = getBezierPath({ - sourceX, - sourceY, - sourcePosition, - targetX, - targetY, - targetPosition, - }); + const [edgePath, labelX, labelY] = getBezierPath({ + sourceX, sourceY, sourcePosition, + targetX, targetY, targetPosition, + });
27-48: Consider CSS improvements and enhanced documentation.While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Extract transform calculations into CSS variables
- Add more specific documentation about what interactions are enabled by
pointerEvents: "all"<EdgeLabelRenderer> <div style={{ - transform: `translate(-50%, -50%) translate(${labelX}px,${labelY}px)`, + '--label-x': `${labelX}px`, + '--label-y': `${labelY}px`, + transform: 'translate(-50%, -50%) translate(var(--label-x), var(--label-y))', // everything inside EdgeLabelRenderer has no pointer events by default - // if you have an interactive element, set pointer-events: all + // setting pointer-events: all enables clicking and hovering on the label pointerEvents: "all", }} className="nodrag nopan absolute z-10 text-sm"apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/edges.ts (4)
9-12: Consider improving type safety and theme flexibility.The marker styling could benefit from:
- Type definition for better type safety
- Theme-aware color implementation for better customization
+import { EdgeMarker } from 'reactflow'; + +const markerEnd: EdgeMarker = { -const markerEnd = { type: MarkerType.Arrow, - color: colors.neutral[700], + color: 'var(--edge-marker-color, ${colors.neutral[700]})', };
14-25: Consider using a more descriptive edge label.The label "in" might be too terse. Consider using a more descriptive label like "deployed in" or "exists in" to improve clarity for users.
style: { stroke: colors.neutral[700] }, markerEnd, - label: "in", + label: "deployed in",
44-54: Consider extracting common edge creation logic.There's duplicate code between this and other edge creation functions. Consider extracting the common edge creation logic into a helper function.
+const createEdge = (source: string, target: string, label: string) => ({ + id: `${source}-${target}`, + source, + target, + style: { stroke: colors.neutral[700] }, + markerEnd, + label, +}); + export const createEdgesFromSystemsToDeployments = (systems: System[]) => systems.flatMap((system) => system.deployments.map((deployment) => ({ - id: `${system.id}-${deployment.id}`, - source: system.id, - target: deployment.id, - style: { stroke: colors.neutral[700] }, - markerEnd, - label: "deploys", + ...createEdge(system.id, deployment.id, "deploys") })), );
56-69: Consider using explicit null check for better readability.While the current null check works, an explicit check would be more readable and consistent with TypeScript best practices.
export const createEdgeFromProviderToResource = ( provider: Provider | null, resource: SCHEMA.Resource, ) => - provider != null + provider === null + ? null ? { id: `${provider.id}-${resource.id}`, source: provider.id, target: resource.id, style: { stroke: colors.neutral[700] }, markerEnd, label: "discovered", - } - : null; + };apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ResourceNode.tsx (3)
6-6: Consider renaming the imported icon component.The alias
ResourceIconforTargetIconmight be confusing as it suggests a different semantic meaning. Consider either:
- Using the original name if it represents a target
- Creating a dedicated ResourceIcon component if it truly represents a resource
39-58: Reduce code duplication in Handle components.The styling logic is duplicated between the target and source Handle components. Consider extracting the common styles into a variable.
+ const handleStyles = cn( + "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500 bg-neutral-800", + isKubernetes && "border-blue-500/70", + isTerraform && "border-purple-500/70", + isSharedCluster && "border-blue-500/70", + ); <Handle type="target" - className={cn( - "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500 bg-neutral-800", - isKubernetes && "border-blue-500/70", - isTerraform && "border-purple-500/70", - isSharedCluster && "border-blue-500/70", - )} + className={handleStyles} position={Position.Top} /> <Handle type="source" - className={cn( - "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-neutral-500 bg-neutral-800", - isKubernetes && "border-blue-500/70", - isTerraform && "border-purple-500/70", - isSharedCluster && "border-blue-500/70", - )} + className={handleStyles} position={Position.Bottom} />
24-30: Consider making the node width configurable.The hardcoded width of
w-[250px]might not be flexible enough for different content lengths or responsive layouts.Consider either:
- Making it a prop with a default value
- Using a relative width with max-width constraints
- Using a CSS variable for easy customization
- "flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border bg-neutral-900 px-4 py-3", + "flex w-full max-w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border bg-neutral-900 px-4 py-3",packages/db/src/schema/resource-provider.ts (2)
68-76: Consider adding uniqueness constraints for project IDsWhile the relationship is correctly defined, consider adding a unique constraint on
projectIdsto prevent duplicate project configurations within the same resource provider. This would ensure data consistency and prevent potential issues with multiple configurations for the same Google project.Here's how you could modify the table definition:
export const resourceProviderGoogle = pgTable( "resource_provider_google", { id: uuid("id").primaryKey().defaultRandom(), resourceProviderId: uuid("resource_provider_id") .notNull() .references(() => resourceProvider.id, { onDelete: "cascade" }), projectIds: text("project_ids").array().notNull(), importGke: boolean("import_gke").notNull().default(false), importNamespaces: boolean("import_namespaces").notNull().default(false), importVCluster: boolean("import_vcluster").notNull().default(false), }, + (t) => ({ + uniqProjectIds: uniqueIndex().on(t.resourceProviderId, t.projectIds), + }), );
Line range hint
32-76: Well-structured schema design for resource visualizationThe schema design effectively supports resource relationship visualization with:
- Clear separation between generic resource providers and Google-specific configurations
- Proper cascading delete behavior to maintain referential integrity
- Flexible relationship modeling that allows for future extension to other cloud providers
Consider documenting these relationship patterns for future maintainers who might add support for other cloud providers.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ProviderNode.tsx (2)
17-24: Consider enhancing component reusability.The component works well but could be more flexible with these improvements:
- Accept a
classNameprop for custom styling- Move color values to a theme configuration for consistency
-export const ProviderIcon: React.FC<{ node: ProviderNodeProps }> = ({ +export const ProviderIcon: React.FC<{ + node: ProviderNodeProps; + className?: string; +}> = ({ node, + className, }) => { const { google } = node.data; if (google != null) - return <IconBrandGoogleFilled className="h-4 w-4 text-red-500" />; + return <IconBrandGoogleFilled className={cn("h-4 w-4 text-red-500", className)} />; - return <IconCube className="h-4 w-4 text-neutral-500" />; + return <IconCube className={cn("h-4 w-4 text-neutral-500", className)} />; };
26-31: Align styling approach with ProviderIcon component.For consistency with the previous component, consider:
- Making colors configurable
- Adding className prop for custom styling
-const ProviderLabel: React.FC<{ node: ProviderNodeProps }> = ({ node }) => { +const ProviderLabel: React.FC<{ + node: ProviderNodeProps; + className?: string; +}> = ({ node, className }) => { const { google } = node.data; if (google != null) - return <span className="text-xs text-red-500">Google Provider</span>; + return <span className={cn("text-xs text-red-500", className)}>Google Provider</span>; - return <span className="text-xs">Resource Provider</span>; + return <span className={cn("text-xs", className)}>Resource Provider</span>; };apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/target-drawer/TargetDrawer.tsx (1)
128-138: Consider enhancing the visualization link with error handling and accessibility improvementsWhile the implementation is solid, consider these enhancements:
- Add error handling for cases where the visualization might not be available
- Enhance accessibility by adding an aria-label to better describe the action
<Link href={`/${workspaceSlug}/targets/${target.id}/visualize`} className={buttonVariants({ variant: "outline", size: "sm", className: "gap-1", })} + aria-label={`Visualize relationships for ${target.name}`} > <IconTopologyStar3 className="h-3 w-3" /> Visualize </Link>packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts (1)
70-73: Consider enhancing relationship metadata for visualization.Given that this PR focuses on resource relationships visualization, you might want to consider adding metadata fields to the
resourceRelationshiptable to support richer visualizations. Some suggestions:
- Add a
metadataJSONB column for storing visualization-specific data (e.g., custom colors, line styles)- Add a
descriptionfield to provide context about the relationship- Consider adding a
strengthorweightfield if you plan to implement hierarchical layoutsThese fields could enhance the visualization capabilities without requiring schema changes later.
Also applies to: 200-220
packages/api/src/router/target.ts (1)
389-392: Improve type safety in provider.google handlingThe current implementation uses the non-null assertion operator (
!) which could lead to runtime errors. Consider using optional chaining or explicit null checks.- google: - resource.provider.google.length > 0 - ? resource.provider.google[0]! - : null, + google: + resource.provider.google?.[0] ?? null,apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx (1)
151-153: Removeconsole.logstatements from production codeIncluding
console.login your code can lead to unnecessary console clutter and potential performance issues in production environments. Consider removing it or implementing a logging mechanism that can be disabled in production builds.Apply this diff to remove the console log statement:
const onNodeClick: NodeMouseHandler = (event, node) => { - console.log(node); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
apps/pty-proxy/src/config.ts(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/edges.ts(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/DeploymentNode.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/EnvironmentNode.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ProviderNode.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ResourceNode.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/SystemNode.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/target-drawer/TargetDrawer.tsx(3 hunks)packages/api/src/router/target.ts(2 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/resource-provider.ts(2 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/system.ts(1 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/workspace.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx (1)
Learnt from: adityachoudhari26
PR: ctrlplanedev/ctrlplane#165
File: apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/relationships/RelationshipsDiagramDependencies.tsx:185-189
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:55:38.456Z
Learning: In `RelationshipsDiagramDependencies.tsx`, when using React Flow's `BaseEdge`, the `markerStart` prop may intentionally use the `markerEnd` value to flip the arrow direction because 'source depends on target' logic is applied. These are intrinsic attributes of the React Flow `BaseEdge` component and cannot be renamed or changed.
🔇 Additional comments (26)
apps/pty-proxy/src/config.ts (2)
15-15: Clarify the relationship to visualization features
Given that this PR is about "Init resource relationships visualization", could you explain how this auth URL change relates to the visualization features? This seems like an unrelated change that might have been included accidentally.
Let's check the visualization-related changes:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for visualization-related files
fd -e tsx -e ts visualize
# Check for auth-related code in visualization components
rg "auth" $(fd -e tsx -e ts visualize)15-15:
Breaking Change: Verify the removal of auth session endpoint path
The default AUTH_URL has been changed from "http://localhost:3000/api/auth/session" to "http://localhost:3000", removing the specific auth endpoint path. This could break authentication if components expect the full session URL.
Let's verify the usage of this auth URL:
✅ Verification successful
No Breaking Change: Auth URL Path is Correctly Appended
The removal of "/api/auth/session" from the default AUTH_URL is not a breaking change. The auth.ts file explicitly appends "/api/auth/session" when making the request:
const res = await fetch(`${env.AUTH_URL}/api/auth/session`, options);This means the authentication endpoint path is properly handled in the code, regardless of whether it's included in the AUTH_URL environment variable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to auth session endpoint
rg -l "api/auth/session" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for direct usage of AUTH_URL
rg "AUTH_URL" --type ts --type tsx -C 3
Length of output: 50436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of AUTH_URL in pty-proxy
rg "AUTH_URL" --type ts --type tsx -C 3 apps/pty-proxy/
# Search for session endpoint usage
rg "api/auth/session" --type ts --type tsx -C 3 apps/pty-proxy/
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of AUTH_URL in pty-proxy without file type filters
rg "AUTH_URL" -C 3 apps/pty-proxy/
# Search for session endpoint usage without file type filters
rg "api/auth/session" -C 3 apps/pty-proxy/
Length of output: 1685
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
4-4: Verify the ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider implementation.
Let's ensure that the imported provider component is properly implemented and exported.
✅ Verification successful
The ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider is properly implemented and exported
The component is correctly implemented in ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx as a React functional component that wraps ResourceVisualizationDiagram with ReactFlowProvider. It's properly exported and used in the visualization page.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider is properly exported
ast-grep --pattern 'export { ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider }' || \
ast-grep --pattern 'export const ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider'
# Check the implementation
rg -A 10 'ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider.*=.*' || \
rg -A 10 'function ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider.*'
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the file first and then examine its contents
fd ResourceVisualizationDiagram --exec cat {}
# As a backup, let's also check for any references to this component
rg "ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 7224
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/DeploymentNode.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Clean and necessary imports
The imports are well-organized and properly typed, including only the necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
1-38: Verify integration with the visualization system
Since this component is part of a larger visualization system, ensure it integrates properly with other node types and the edge components.
✅ Verification successful
DeploymentNode properly integrates with visualization system
The component follows the established patterns seen in other node components:
- Consistent structure with other nodes (EnvironmentNode, ResourceNode)
- Proper Handle components for top and bottom connections
- Consistent styling approach using color themes
- Correct implementation of NodeProps and reactflow interfaces
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify integration with other visualization components
# Check for other node types and their styling consistency
echo "Checking for other node types..."
fd --type f --glob '*Node.tsx' "$(dirname "$0")"
# Check for edge definitions that might connect to this node
echo "Checking for edge definitions..."
rg --type typescript "DeploymentNode" -A 5
Length of output: 1614
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the other node components in the same directory for styling consistency
echo "Checking EnvironmentNode styling..."
cat "/home/jailuser/git/apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/EnvironmentNode.tsx"
echo -e "\nChecking ResourceNode styling..."
cat "/home/jailuser/git/apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ResourceNode.tsx"
# Let's also check for any flow-related configuration or edge definitions
echo -e "\nChecking for flow configurations..."
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "reactflow.*Handle" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/"
Length of output: 3749
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/EnvironmentNode.tsx (1)
6-38: Verify integration with ResourceVisualizationDiagram
The component looks well-structured, but let's verify its integration with the broader visualization system.
✅ Verification successful
EnvironmentNode is properly integrated with the visualization system
The component is correctly integrated within the React Flow visualization system:
- Properly imported and registered in
ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsxas a node type with the correct NodeType.Environment key - Follows the same structure as other node components in the system
- Correctly implements the required React Flow node interfaces with proper Handle components for connections
- Used consistently across different visualization contexts (resource visualization and flow diagrams)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper integration of EnvironmentNode in the visualization system
# Check if EnvironmentNode is properly registered in the node types
rg -A 5 "nodeTypes.*EnvironmentNode" apps/webservice/src/app
# Check for any custom edge definitions related to EnvironmentNode
rg "source.*Environment.*target|target.*Environment.*source" apps/webservice/src/app
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the visualization system structure
# Find files containing EnvironmentNode references
rg "EnvironmentNode" apps/webservice/src/app
# Look for React Flow node type definitions or mappings
rg -A 5 "nodeTypes.*=|getNodeTypes" apps/webservice/src/app
# Search for files that might contain node registration logic
fd "diagram|flow|graph" apps/webservice/src/app
# Look for the parent component that might be using EnvironmentNode
ast-grep --pattern 'import { EnvironmentNode } from "$_"'
Length of output: 12556
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/SystemNode.tsx (1)
1-38: Overall implementation looks good!
The SystemNode component is well-structured and implements the required functionality correctly. The suggested improvements are optional enhancements that could make the component more maintainable and reusable.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx (2)
1-15: LGTM! Component declaration and imports are well-structured.
The component properly leverages React Flow's type system and includes all necessary imports. The default style initialization is a good practice.
31-31: Design note about markerEnd usage.
The use of markerEnd for arrow direction is intentional and follows React Flow's convention where 'source depends on target' logic is applied.
packages/db/src/schema/system.ts (2)
51-57: LGTM! The workspace relationship is correctly defined.
The one-to-one relationship is properly configured with appropriate field mappings and follows Drizzle ORM best practices.
51-57: Verify the bi-directional relationship setup
Please ensure that:
- The corresponding relationship is defined in workspace.ts
- Existing data has valid workspace associations
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the relationship setup.
Based on the results, I can now provide the final response:
Bi-directional relationship is correctly configured
The verification confirms that:
- The workspace relation is properly defined with
systems: many(system)in workspace.ts - The system table has a proper foreign key constraint to workspace table with
ON DELETE no action, ensuring data integrity
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the bi-directional relationship setup and data integrity
# Check if workspace.ts defines the reverse relationship
echo "Checking workspace.ts for system relationship..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const workspaceRelations = relations(workspace, ({ $_ }) => ({
$$$
systems: $_($_, {
$$$
}),
$$$
}))'
# Check if all systems have valid workspace associations
echo "Checking for systems without workspace associations..."
rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*system" | while read -r file; do
echo "Found system table definition in: $file"
done
Length of output: 592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the workspace relations definition
echo "Checking workspace.ts content..."
rg -A 10 "workspaceRelations.*=.*relations" packages/db/src/schema/
# Check the system table definition for workspace reference
echo "Checking system table definition..."
cat packages/db/drizzle/0000_busy_firebird.sql
Length of output: 40388
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/edges.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined types.
The imports are specific and the Provider type is properly defined with nullable properties.
27-30: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The System type properly extends the base schema type with strongly-typed arrays.
32-42: LGTM! Efficient implementation with clear relationship labeling.
The function effectively handles the nested structure using flatMap and provides clear relationship labeling.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ResourceNode.tsx (1)
8-14: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The ResourceNodeProps type is well-defined with clear property names and appropriate types. The extension of NodeProps from reactflow is correctly implemented.
packages/db/src/schema/resource-provider.ts (1)
32-35: LGTM: Relationship is correctly defined
The many-to-many relationship between resourceProvider and resourceProviderGoogle is properly established, allowing multiple Google configurations per resource provider.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/nodes/ProviderNode.tsx (2)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definition.
The imports are properly organized and the ProviderNodeProps type is well-defined with appropriate typing for all fields.
1-72: Consider adding ARIA attributes for accessibility.
The component could benefit from improved accessibility support for users relying on screen readers.
Consider adding these accessibility improvements:
<div
className={cn(
"relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3",
node.data.google != null && "border-red-600 bg-red-900/30",
)}
+ role="button"
+ aria-label={`${data.google ? 'Google' : 'Resource'} Provider: ${data.label}`}
>packages/db/src/schema/workspace.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized
The new imports are correctly placed and necessary for defining the workspace relationships.
Also applies to: 15-16
51-54: Verify bidirectional relationships and migration strategy
The workspace relations are correctly defined, but please ensure:
- Corresponding relations are defined in
resource.tsandsystem.ts - Cascade delete behavior is consistent across related entities
- Database migration strategy is in place for these new relationships
Let's verify the related schema definitions:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Bidirectional relationships are properly defined
The workspace-resource and workspace-system relationships are correctly implemented:
- In
workspace.ts: The workspace defines many-to-many relationships with resources and systems - In
resource.ts: The resource defines a one-to-one relationship with workspace viaworkspaceIdforeign key with cascade delete - In
system.ts: The system defines a one-to-one relationship with workspace viaworkspaceIdforeign key with cascade delete
The cascade delete behavior is consistently defined across all entities, ensuring data integrity:
- Resources:
onDelete: "cascade"onworkspaceId - Systems:
onDelete: "cascade"onworkspaceId
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for corresponding relationship definitions in resource.ts and system.ts
echo "Checking resource.ts for workspace relation:"
rg -A 5 "relations.*workspace" packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts
echo "Checking system.ts for workspace relation:"
rg -A 5 "relations.*workspace" packages/db/src/schema/system.ts
# Check for any existing migrations
echo "Checking for related migrations:"
fd -e sql . packages/db/migrations
Length of output: 549
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the files exist and their locations
echo "Searching for schema files:"
fd -t f "resource.ts|system.ts|workspace.ts"
# Then let's examine the content of these files
echo -e "\nChecking resource.ts content:"
fd -t f "resource.ts" --exec cat {}
echo -e "\nChecking system.ts content:"
fd -t f "system.ts" --exec cat {}
# Let's also check for migrations directory
echo -e "\nSearching for migrations directory:"
fd -t d "migrations"
Length of output: 32230
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/target-drawer/TargetDrawer.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM: Clean import addition
The addition of useParams import is properly organized alongside the existing navigation imports.
37-37: LGTM: Proper hook usage with type safety
The useParams hook is correctly implemented with proper TypeScript type checking for the workspaceSlug parameter.
128-138: Verify the visualization route handling
Ensure that the visualization route is properly set up to handle the provided parameters.
✅ Verification successful
Route exists and is properly handling parameters
The visualization route is correctly implemented at apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx. The page component:
- Properly extracts the
targetIdparameter - Fetches the required resource and its relationships
- Handles the not-found case appropriately
- Renders a visualization diagram component with the necessary data
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the visualization page route exists and handles the parameters correctly
fd -e tsx -e ts "page" "app/\[workspaceSlug\]/targets/\[targetId\]/visualize"
# Check for any route parameter validation
rg -l "params.*targetId.*workspaceSlug" "app/\[workspaceSlug\]/targets/\[targetId\]/visualize"
Length of output: 407
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the visualization route exists anywhere in the codebase
fd -e tsx -e ts "page" "apps/webservice/src"
# Search for any route handling related to target visualization
rg -l "targets/\[.*\]/visualize" "apps/webservice/src"
# Search for any components or logic related to target visualization
rg -l "visualize.*target" "apps/webservice/src"
Length of output: 4586
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the visualize page since we found it in the first search
cat "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx"
# Also check for any related components or utilities
rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "visualize" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/"
Length of output: 829
packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts (1)
70-73: LGTM! The workspace relation is properly defined.
The new one-to-one relationship between resource and workspace is correctly implemented, using proper field references and maintaining consistency with the existing schema constraints.
Let's verify the relationship definition is consistent with other related schemas:
✅ Verification successful
The workspace relation is correctly defined and consistent with the schema
The verification confirms:
- The
resourcetable has a properworkspaceIdfield (as seen in the relations) - The
workspacerelation inresourceRelationscorrectly mapsresource.workspaceIdtoworkspace.id - The
workspacetable has a correspondingmanyrelation to resources inworkspaceRelations - No conflicting unique constraints were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workspace relationship consistency across schema files
# Check for corresponding relationship in workspace schema
echo "Checking workspace schema for corresponding resource relationship..."
rg -A 5 "relations.*workspace.*" packages/db/src/schema/workspace.ts
# Verify no conflicting unique constraints
echo "Checking for any conflicting unique constraints..."
rg "uniqueIndex.*workspace.*resource" packages/db/src/schema/
Length of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the schema definitions more thoroughly
# Check resource table definition for workspaceId field and constraints
echo "Checking resource table definition..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "export const resource = pgTable" packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts
# Check all relations defined in resource schema
echo "Checking resource relations..."
rg -B 2 -A 10 "export const resourceRelations" packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts
# Check workspace table definition
echo "Checking workspace table definition..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "export const workspace = pgTable" packages/db/src/schema/workspace.ts
Length of output: 2422
packages/api/src/router/target.ts (1)
12-12: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate
The isNotNull import is correctly placed and properly utilized in the new relationships procedure.
| const resource = await api.resource.byId(targetId); | ||
| if (resource == null) return notFound(); | ||
| const relationships = await api.resource.relationships(resource.id); | ||
| if (relationships == null) return notFound(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize API calls and enhance error handling.
- Consider using Promise.all to parallelize the API calls since the relationships fetch doesn't depend on the resource data beyond the ID.
- Add proper error handling for API failures beyond just "not found" scenarios.
Here's a suggested implementation:
try {
const [resource, relationships] = await Promise.all([
api.resource.byId(targetId),
api.resource.relationships(targetId)
]);
if (!resource || !relationships) {
return notFound();
}
return (
<ResourceVisualizationDiagramProvider
resource={resource}
relationships={relationships}
/>
);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to fetch visualization data:', error);
throw error; // Let the error boundary handle it
}| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <div className="relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-amber-600 bg-amber-900/30 px-4 py-3"> | ||
| <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> | ||
| <IconShip className="h-4 w-4 text-amber-500" /> | ||
| <span className="text-xs">Deployment</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance maintainability and error handling
Consider the following improvements:
- Extract color and dimension constants
- Add error handling for missing data
Here's a suggested implementation:
+const STYLES = {
+ container: "relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-amber-600 bg-amber-900/30 px-4 py-3",
+ header: "flex items-center gap-2",
+ icon: "h-4 w-4 text-amber-500",
+ label: "text-xs",
+ content: "text-sm"
+} as const;
export const DeploymentNode: React.FC<NodeProps> = (node) => {
const { data } = node;
+ if (!data?.label) {
+ console.warn('DeploymentNode: Missing required data.label');
+ return null;
+ }
return (
<>
- <div className="relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-amber-600 bg-amber-900/30 px-4 py-3">
- <div className="flex items-center gap-2">
- <IconShip className="h-4 w-4 text-amber-500" />
- <span className="text-xs">Deployment</span>
+ <div className={STYLES.container}>
+ <div className={STYLES.header}>
+ <IconShip className={STYLES.icon} />
+ <span className={STYLES.label}>Deployment</span>
</div>
- <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div>
+ <div className={STYLES.content}>{data.label}</div>
</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return ( | |
| <> | |
| <div className="relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-amber-600 bg-amber-900/30 px-4 py-3"> | |
| <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> | |
| <IconShip className="h-4 w-4 text-amber-500" /> | |
| <span className="text-xs">Deployment</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> | |
| </div> | |
| const STYLES = { | |
| container: "relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-amber-600 bg-amber-900/30 px-4 py-3", | |
| header: "flex items-center gap-2", | |
| icon: "h-4 w-4 text-amber-500", | |
| label: "text-xs", | |
| content: "text-sm" | |
| } as const; | |
| export const DeploymentNode: React.FC<NodeProps> = (node) => { | |
| const { data } = node; | |
| if (!data?.label) { | |
| console.warn('DeploymentNode: Missing required data.label'); | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| return ( | |
| <> | |
| <div className={STYLES.container}> | |
| <div className={STYLES.header}> | |
| <IconShip className={STYLES.icon} /> | |
| <span className={STYLES.label}>Deployment</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className={STYLES.content}>{data.label}</div> | |
| </div> |
| targetPosition, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const edgeLabel = capitalCase(String(label).replace("_", " ")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix underscore replacement to handle multiple occurrences.
The current implementation only replaces the first underscore in the label. Use a regular expression to replace all underscores.
- const edgeLabel = capitalCase(String(label).replace("_", " "));
+ const edgeLabel = capitalCase(String(label).replace(/_/g, " "));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const edgeLabel = capitalCase(String(label).replace("_", " ")); | |
| const edgeLabel = capitalCase(String(label).replace(/_/g, " ")); |
| const isKubernetes = data.version.includes("kubernetes"); | ||
| const isTerraform = data.version.includes("terraform"); | ||
| const isSharedCluster = data.kind.toLowerCase().includes("sharedcluster"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen the resource type detection logic.
The current string matching approach using includes() might be fragile:
- Case sensitivity might cause issues (only
kindis converted to lowercase) - Partial matches could lead to false positives (e.g., "kubernetes-dev" vs "kubernetes")
- No validation for undefined/null values
Consider this more robust approach:
- const isKubernetes = data.version.includes("kubernetes");
- const isTerraform = data.version.includes("terraform");
- const isSharedCluster = data.kind.toLowerCase().includes("sharedcluster");
+ const isKubernetes = data.version?.toLowerCase() === "kubernetes";
+ const isTerraform = data.version?.toLowerCase() === "terraform";
+ const isSharedCluster = data.kind?.toLowerCase() === "sharedcluster";Also, consider defining an enum or constant for these values to prevent typos:
const RESOURCE_TYPES = {
KUBERNETES: "kubernetes",
TERRAFORM: "terraform",
SHARED_CLUSTER: "sharedcluster"
} as const;| export const ProviderNode: React.FC<ProviderNodeProps> = (node) => { | ||
| const { data } = node; | ||
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <div | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| "relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3", | ||
| node.data.google != null && "border-red-600 bg-red-900/30", | ||
| )} | ||
| > | ||
| <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> | ||
| <ProviderIcon node={node} /> | ||
| <ProviderLabel node={node} /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <Handle | ||
| type="target" | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800", | ||
| data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800", | ||
| )} | ||
| position={Position.Top} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Handle | ||
| type="source" | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800", | ||
| data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800", | ||
| )} | ||
| style={{ | ||
| bottom: "0", | ||
| left: "50%", | ||
| transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", | ||
| }} | ||
| position={Position.Bottom} | ||
| /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve code organization and reduce duplication.
The component has several areas for improvement:
- Extract duplicate handle styles into a shared constant
- Consider extracting handle positioning logic into a utility
- Break down the complex JSX structure into smaller components
+const getHandleStyles = (isGoogle: boolean) => cn(
+ "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800",
+ isGoogle && "border-red-500 bg-red-800",
+);
+
+const BottomHandlePosition = {
+ bottom: "0",
+ left: "50%",
+ transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)",
+} as const;
+
export const ProviderNode: React.FC<ProviderNodeProps> = (node) => {
const { data } = node;
+ const handleStyles = getHandleStyles(data.google != null);
return (
<>
<div
className={cn(
"relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3",
node.data.google != null && "border-red-600 bg-red-900/30",
)}
>
<div className="flex items-center gap-2">
<ProviderIcon node={node} />
<ProviderLabel node={node} />
</div>
<div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div>
</div>
<Handle
type="target"
- className={cn(
- "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800",
- data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800",
- )}
+ className={handleStyles}
position={Position.Top}
/>
<Handle
type="source"
- className={cn(
- "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800",
- data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800",
- )}
- style={{
- bottom: "0",
- left: "50%",
- transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)",
- }}
+ className={handleStyles}
+ style={BottomHandlePosition}
position={Position.Bottom}
/>
</>
);
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const ProviderNode: React.FC<ProviderNodeProps> = (node) => { | |
| const { data } = node; | |
| return ( | |
| <> | |
| <div | |
| className={cn( | |
| "relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3", | |
| node.data.google != null && "border-red-600 bg-red-900/30", | |
| )} | |
| > | |
| <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> | |
| <ProviderIcon node={node} /> | |
| <ProviderLabel node={node} /> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> | |
| </div> | |
| <Handle | |
| type="target" | |
| className={cn( | |
| "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800", | |
| data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800", | |
| )} | |
| position={Position.Top} | |
| /> | |
| <Handle | |
| type="source" | |
| className={cn( | |
| "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800", | |
| data.google != null && "border-red-500 bg-red-800", | |
| )} | |
| style={{ | |
| bottom: "0", | |
| left: "50%", | |
| transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", | |
| }} | |
| position={Position.Bottom} | |
| /> | |
| </> | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| const getHandleStyles = (isGoogle: boolean) => cn( | |
| "h-2 w-2 rounded-full border border-green-500 bg-neutral-800", | |
| isGoogle && "border-red-500 bg-red-800", | |
| ); | |
| const BottomHandlePosition = { | |
| bottom: "0", | |
| left: "50%", | |
| transform: "translate(-50%, 50%)", | |
| } as const; | |
| export const ProviderNode: React.FC<ProviderNodeProps> = (node) => { | |
| const { data } = node; | |
| const handleStyles = getHandleStyles(data.google != null); | |
| return ( | |
| <> | |
| <div | |
| className={cn( | |
| "relative flex w-[250px] flex-col gap-2 rounded-md border border-green-600 bg-green-900/30 px-4 py-3", | |
| node.data.google != null && "border-red-600 bg-red-900/30", | |
| )} | |
| > | |
| <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> | |
| <ProviderIcon node={node} /> | |
| <ProviderLabel node={node} /> | |
| </div> | |
| <div className="text-sm">{data.label}</div> | |
| </div> | |
| <Handle | |
| type="target" | |
| className={handleStyles} | |
| position={Position.Top} | |
| /> | |
| <Handle | |
| type="source" | |
| className={handleStyles} | |
| style={BottomHandlePosition} | |
| position={Position.Bottom} | |
| /> | |
| </> | |
| ); | |
| }; |
| const matchedEnvironments = await Promise.all( | ||
| matchedEnvironmentsPromises, | ||
| ).then((t) => t.filter(isPresent)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for Promise.all operations
The current implementation doesn't handle potential promise rejections explicitly. Consider adding error handling to gracefully handle failures.
- const matchedEnvironments = await Promise.all(matchedEnvironmentsPromises)
- .then((t) => t.filter(isPresent));
+ const matchedEnvironments = await Promise.all(matchedEnvironmentsPromises)
+ .then((t) => t.filter(isPresent))
+ .catch((error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch matched environments:', error);
+ throw new TRPCError({
+ code: 'INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR',
+ message: 'Failed to process environment matches',
+ });
+ });Also applies to: 380-382
| const matchedSystemsPromises = systems.map(async (s) => { | ||
| const matchedEnvironmentsPromises = s.environments.map(async (e) => { | ||
| const matchedResource = await ctx.db.query.resource.findFirst({ | ||
| where: and( | ||
| eq(schema.resource.workspaceId, s.workspaceId), | ||
| schema.resourceMatchesMetadata(ctx.db, e.resourceFilter), | ||
| ), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return matchedResource != null ? e : null; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const matchedEnvironments = await Promise.all( | ||
| matchedEnvironmentsPromises, | ||
| ).then((t) => t.filter(isPresent)); | ||
| if (matchedEnvironments.length === 0) return null; | ||
|
|
||
| return { ...s, environments: matchedEnvironments }; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing database queries to reduce N+1 problems
The current implementation performs database queries in a loop for each environment, which could lead to performance issues with larger datasets. Consider refactoring to use a single query with JOIN operations.
Here's a suggested approach:
- const matchedSystemsPromises = systems.map(async (s) => {
- const matchedEnvironmentsPromises = s.environments.map(async (e) => {
- const matchedResource = await ctx.db.query.resource.findFirst({
- where: and(
- eq(schema.resource.workspaceId, s.workspaceId),
- schema.resourceMatchesMetadata(ctx.db, e.resourceFilter),
- ),
- });
- return matchedResource != null ? e : null;
- });
- const matchedEnvironments = await Promise.all(matchedEnvironmentsPromises)
- .then((t) => t.filter(isPresent));
- if (matchedEnvironments.length === 0) return null;
- return { ...s, environments: matchedEnvironments };
- });
+ const matchedResources = await ctx.db
+ .select({
+ systemId: schema.system.id,
+ environmentId: schema.environment.id,
+ resourceId: schema.resource.id
+ })
+ .from(schema.resource)
+ .innerJoin(schema.environment, (join) =>
+ join.where(schema.resourceMatchesMetadata(ctx.db, schema.environment.resourceFilter))
+ )
+ .where(
+ inArray(
+ schema.system.id,
+ systems.map(s => s.id)
+ )
+ );
+
+ const matchedSystems = systems
+ .map(s => {
+ const envMatches = matchedResources
+ .filter(m => m.systemId === s.id)
+ .map(m => s.environments.find(e => e.id === m.environmentId))
+ .filter(isPresent);
+ return envMatches.length > 0 ? { ...s, environments: envMatches } : null;
+ })
+ .filter(isPresent);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| window.requestAnimationFrame(() => { | ||
| // hack to get it to center - we should figure out when the layout is done | ||
| // and then call fitView. We are betting that everything should be | ||
| // rendered correctly in 100ms before fitting the view. | ||
| sleep(100).then(() => fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 })); | ||
| }); | ||
| }, [getNodes, getEdges, setNodes, setEdges, fitView]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace arbitrary delays with event-driven logic for consistent rendering
Using sleep(100) to delay the fitView call relies on a fixed timeout, which may lead to inconsistent behavior across different devices or datasets. Instead, utilize event-driven mechanisms to trigger fitView after the layout computation is complete, ensuring reliability and better performance.
Consider refactoring your code to call fitView after the nodes and edges have been updated:
setEdges([...layouted.edges]);
+ // Call fitView after nodes and edges are updated
+ fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 });
});
-
- window.requestAnimationFrame(() => {
- // hack to get it to center - we should figure out when the layout is done
- // and then call fitView. We are betting that everything should be
- // rendered correctly in 100ms before fitting the view.
- sleep(100).then(() => fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 }));
- });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@zacharyblasczyk figured a better way to do this. Could you look at how we do this in other reactflows
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (reactFlowInstance != null) onLayout(); | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | ||
| }, [reactFlowInstance]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid disabling ESLint rules; properly manage dependencies in useEffect
Disabling react-hooks/exhaustive-deps can mask issues with missing dependencies, leading to unintended side effects. Instead, include all necessary dependencies in the dependency array or refactor your code to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
Update the useEffect hook to include onLayout in the dependency array:
useEffect(() => {
if (reactFlowInstance != null) onLayout();
- // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
-}, [reactFlowInstance]);
+}, [reactFlowInstance, onLayout]);Ensure that onLayout is memoized correctly with useCallback and includes all dependencies to prevent re-creation on each render.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx (3)
36-52: Consider enhancing type safety for edge typesWhile node types are well-defined with an enum, edge types lack similar type safety. Consider creating an enum for edge types as well.
+enum EdgeType { + Default = 'default' +} -const edgeTypes: EdgeTypes = { default: DepEdge }; +const edgeTypes: EdgeTypes = { [EdgeType.Default]: DepEdge };
53-67: Consider making layout parameters configurableThe layout parameters (direction "TB", spacing 0, 50) are hardcoded. Consider making these configurable through props for better flexibility.
+type LayoutConfig = { + direction?: 'TB' | 'LR' | 'RL' | 'BT'; + rankSeparation?: number; + nodeSeparation?: number; +}; -const useOnLayout = (setIsLayouted: (isLayouted: boolean) => void) => { +const useOnLayout = ( + setIsLayouted: (isLayouted: boolean) => void, + config?: LayoutConfig +) => { const { getNodes, setNodes, setEdges, getEdges } = useReactFlow(); return useCallback(() => { const layouted = getLayoutedElementsDagre( getNodes(), getEdges(), - "TB", - 0, - 50, + config?.direction ?? "TB", + config?.rankSeparation ?? 0, + config?.nodeSeparation ?? 50, ); setNodes([...layouted.nodes]); setEdges([...layouted.edges]); setIsLayouted(true); - }, [getNodes, getEdges, setNodes, setEdges, setIsLayouted]); + }, [getNodes, getEdges, setNodes, setEdges, setIsLayouted, config]);
75-112: Extract node initialization logicThe node initialization logic is complex and could be moved to a separate function for better maintainability.
+const createInitialNodes = ( + resource: SCHEMA.Resource, + systems: Relationships['systems'], + provider: Relationships['provider'] +) => compact([ + { + id: resource.id, + type: NodeType.Resource, + data: { ...resource, label: resource.identifier }, + position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, + }, + ...systems.flatMap((system) => + system.environments.map((env) => ({ + id: env.id, + type: NodeType.Environment, + data: { ...env, label: env.name }, + position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, + })), + ), + // ... rest of the node creation logic +]); - const [nodes, _, onNodesChange] = useNodesState<{ label: string }>( - compact([ - { - id: resource.id, - type: NodeType.Resource, - // ... current implementation - }, - ]), - ); + const [nodes, _, onNodesChange] = useNodesState<{ label: string }>( + createInitialNodes(resource, systems, provider) + );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx(1 hunks)packages/api/src/router/target.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/DepEdge.tsx
- apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx
- packages/api/src/router/target.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx (3)
1-34: LGTM: Well-structured imports and type definitions
The imports and type definitions are properly organized, with clear separation between external dependencies and local components.
135-138: Previous review comment is still valid: Fix ESLint dependency warning
The ESLint disable comment masks potential issues. The previous review suggestion to properly manage dependencies is still applicable.
169-175: LGTM: Well-implemented provider component
The provider component correctly wraps the main component with ReactFlow's context.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if ( | ||
| reactFlowInstance != null && | ||
| nodes.length && | ||
| isLayouted && | ||
| !isViewFitted | ||
| ) { | ||
| reactFlowInstance.fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 }); | ||
| setIsViewFitted(true); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [reactFlowInstance, nodes, isLayouted, isViewFitted]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve view fitting logic
The current implementation relies on multiple state flags. Consider using React Flow's built-in onNodesChange callback for more reliable view fitting.
- useEffect(() => {
- if (
- reactFlowInstance != null &&
- nodes.length &&
- isLayouted &&
- !isViewFitted
- ) {
- reactFlowInstance.fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 });
- setIsViewFitted(true);
- }
- }, [reactFlowInstance, nodes, isLayouted, isViewFitted]);
+ const onNodesChange = useCallback((changes) => {
+ _onNodesChange(changes);
+ if (reactFlowInstance && changes.length > 0) {
+ reactFlowInstance.fitView({ padding: 0.12, maxZoom: 1 });
+ }
+ }, [reactFlowInstance]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
…latioships-visualization
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx (2)
35-51: Consider enhancing type safety for edge types.The node types configuration is well-structured. For consistency and type safety, consider defining an EdgeType enum similar to NodeType.
+enum EdgeType { + Default = "default", +} const nodeTypes: NodeTypes = { [NodeType.Resource]: ResourceNode, [NodeType.Environment]: EnvironmentNode, [NodeType.Provider]: ProviderNode, [NodeType.System]: SystemNode, [NodeType.Deployment]: DeploymentNode, }; -const edgeTypes: EdgeTypes = { default: DepEdge }; +const edgeTypes: EdgeTypes = { [EdgeType.Default]: DepEdge };
56-93: Consider improving initial node positioning strategy.Currently, all nodes are initialized at position {x: 0, y: 0} before the layout algorithm runs. This could cause visual flickering as nodes move from their initial position to their final layout position.
Consider implementing a basic initial positioning strategy to reduce layout shifts:
+const getInitialPosition = (type: NodeType, index: number) => { + const spacing = 200; + switch (type) { + case NodeType.Resource: + return { x: 0, y: 0 }; + case NodeType.Environment: + return { x: spacing, y: index * spacing }; + case NodeType.System: + return { x: spacing * 2, y: index * spacing }; + case NodeType.Deployment: + return { x: spacing * 3, y: index * spacing }; + case NodeType.Provider: + return { x: -spacing, y: 0 }; + } +};Then use it in node creation:
- position: { x: 0, y: 0 }, + position: getInitialPosition(NodeType.Environment, index),packages/api/src/router/resources.ts (1)
339-355: Consider optimizing the query structure for better performance.The current implementation fetches all systems and environments upfront and then filters them in memory. Consider pushing more filtering to the database level to reduce the data transfer and processing overhead.
const resource = await ctx.db.query.resource.findFirst({ where: eq(schema.resource.id, input), with: { provider: { with: { google: true } }, workspace: { with: { systems: { with: { - environments: { where: hasFilter }, + environments: { + where: and( + hasFilter, + schema.resourceMatchesMetadata(ctx.db, schema.environment.resourceFilter) + ) + }, deployments: true, }, }, }, }, }, });apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/reactflow/layout.ts (3)
75-118: Consider passingconfigas a dependency inuseCallbackWhile
configis included in the dependency array ofonLayout, if any of its properties change,onLayoutwill recalculate. Ensure that this behavior is intended. Ifconfigis expected to remain constant, consider memoizing it or specifying individual config properties in the dependency array for more granular control.
94-95: Optimize state management forreactFlowInstanceCurrently,
reactFlowInstanceis stored in state usinguseState. SincereactFlowInstanceis an object reference that may change frequently, consider usinguseRefinstead to avoid unnecessary re-renders.Apply this diff to use
useRef:- const [reactFlowInstance, setReactFlowInstance] = - useState<ReactFlowInstance | null>(null); + const reactFlowInstance = useRef<ReactFlowInstance | null>(null);And update references accordingly.
117-117: Provide clear usage instructions foruseLayoutAndFitViewhookReturning
setReactFlowInstancemay not be immediately intuitive for users of the hook. Consider returning an object with clearly named properties or providing documentation to guide developers on how to use the hook effectively.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/reactflow/layout.ts(2 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/target-drawer/TargetDrawer.tsx(3 hunks)packages/api/src/router/resources.ts(2 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/db/src/schema/resource.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx (3)
1-33: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are properly organized, and the type definitions are clear and properly leverage the schema types.
131-137: LGTM! Clean provider implementation.
The provider component is well-implemented, properly wrapping the main component with ReactFlowProvider and handling prop forwarding correctly.
112-112: Verify the layout hook implementation.
The useLayoutAndFitView hook is crucial for proper diagram rendering. Let's verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
The implementation of useLayoutAndFitView has been found and verified. The hook properly handles both layout computation and view fitting through:
- Layout management using
getLayoutedElementsDagrewith configurable parameters - Proper state management for layout and view fitting status
- Automatic layout computation when ReactFlow instance is available
- View fitting with configurable padding and zoom levels
- Correct dependency arrays in the useEffect hooks
The implementation follows React best practices and handles the diagram rendering requirements effectively.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of useLayoutAndFitView hook
# Expected: The hook should handle layout computation and view fitting
# Search for the hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useLayoutAndFitView = $_' -A 20
# Check for any related test files
fd -g "*layout*.test.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 4698
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/target-drawer/TargetDrawer.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM: Clean implementation of workspace-aware routing
The addition of useParams hook and workspace slug extraction follows Next.js best practices for dynamic routing while maintaining type safety.
Also applies to: 37-37
packages/api/src/router/resources.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM!
The isNotNull import is correctly placed and necessary for the new functionality.
336-337: LGTM!
The procedure signature is well-defined with proper input validation using zod's UUID schema.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/_components/reactflow/layout.ts (1)
109-114: Ensure fitView is called only once when conditions are met
The effect depends on several variables, including nodes, isLayouted, and isViewFitted. If any of these change, the effect may re-run. Confirm that setIsViewFitted(true) properly prevents redundant calls to fitView. Additionally, consider whether the conditions accurately reflect when fitView should be invoked.
| <Link | ||
| href={`/${workspaceSlug}/targets/${target.id}/visualize`} | ||
| className={buttonVariants({ | ||
| variant: "outline", | ||
| size: "sm", | ||
| className: "gap-1", | ||
| })} | ||
| > | ||
| <IconTopologyStar3 className="h-3 w-3" /> Visualize | ||
| </Link> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Visualization route is properly implemented but lacks target type validation
The visualization route and component are properly implemented with:
- A dedicated page component that fetches resource and relationship data
- A comprehensive visualization diagram component using ReactFlow
- Proper error handling with
notFound()
However, the implementation doesn't validate target types or states before rendering. Consider:
- Adding type validation before fetching relationships
- Conditionally showing the visualization button based on target type/state
- Adding error boundaries for unsupported target types
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify visualization route and consider conditional rendering
While the implementation looks clean, please ensure:
- The visualization route
/${workspaceSlug}/targets/${target.id}/visualizeis properly implemented - Consider if the visualization button should be conditionally rendered based on target type or state
Let's verify the visualization route implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the visualization page component exists
fd -e tsx -e ts "page" "app/\[workspaceSlug\]/targets/\[targetId\]/visualize"
# Check for any route handlers
fd -e tsx -e ts "route" "app/\[workspaceSlug\]/targets/\[targetId\]/visualize"
# Look for visualization-related components
rg -t tsx -t ts "ResourceVisualizationDiagram|VisualizePage" -l
Length of output: 530
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find visualization-related files and routes
# Search for visualization-related files in the app directory
fd -t f "visual|visualize" apps/webservice/src/app
# Search for route patterns or components related to visualization
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "visualize|visualization" apps/webservice/src/app
# Look for any page components under targets directory
fd -t f "page.tsx" apps/webservice/src/app/\[workspaceSlug\]/targets
Length of output: 786
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the visualization component and look for a page component
# Check the content of ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx
cat "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/ResourceVisualizationDiagram.tsx"
# Look for a page.tsx in the visualize directory
fd -t f "page.tsx" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize"
# Check if there are any layout files in the visualize directory
fd -t f "layout.tsx" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize"
Length of output: 4435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the visualization page component
# Check the content of the page component
cat "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize/page.tsx"
# Look for any target type checks or conditional rendering logic
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "type.*Target|targetType" apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(targets)/targets/[targetId]/visualize
Length of output: 1104
| resource.provider.google.length > 0 | ||
| ? resource.provider.google[0]! | ||
| : null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix unsafe array access of Google provider.
The current implementation uses the non-null assertion operator (!) which could lead to runtime errors. Consider using optional chaining or proper null checking.
- google:
- resource.provider.google.length > 0
- ? resource.provider.google[0]!
- : null,
+ google: resource.provider.google[0] ?? null,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| resource.provider.google.length > 0 | |
| ? resource.provider.google[0]! | |
| : null, | |
| resource.provider.google[0] ?? null, |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (reactFlowInstance != null) onLayout(); | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | ||
| }, [reactFlowInstance]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid disabling react-hooks/exhaustive-deps; ensure dependencies are complete
Disabling the react-hooks/exhaustive-deps ESLint rule can mask potential bugs related to missing dependencies in the useEffect hook. Instead of disabling the rule, include all necessary dependencies to ensure the effect behaves as expected. In this case, onLayout should be added to the dependency array.
Apply this diff to fix the dependency array:
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
- }, [reactFlowInstance]);
+ }, [reactFlowInstance, onLayout]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (reactFlowInstance != null) onLayout(); | |
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | |
| }, [reactFlowInstance]); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (reactFlowInstance != null) onLayout(); | |
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | |
| }, [reactFlowInstance, onLayout]); |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
DepEdgecomponent for custom edges in flow diagrams.ResourceVisualizationDiagramandResourceVisualizationDiagramProviderfor visualizing resource relationships.DeploymentNode,EnvironmentNode,ProviderNode,ResourceNode, andSystemNode.VisualizePagecomponent for rendering visualization pages.TargetDrawerwith direct links to visualization pages.relationshipsprocedure for querying resource connections.Improvements