fix: Revert policy approval stuff with better UI #281
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive shift from environment-based approvals to policy-based approvals across multiple components of the system. The changes span database schema modifications, API routes, frontend components, and job dispatch logic. The primary transformation involves replacing Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PolicyApproval
participant Release
participant Environment
User->>PolicyApproval: Initiate Approval
PolicyApproval->>Release: Check Release Details
PolicyApproval->>Environment: Validate Linked Environments
PolicyApproval-->>User: Approve/Reject Release
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx (1)
53-53: LGTM! Consider memoizing for large environment lists.The addition of
linkedEnvironmentsaligns well with the policy-based approval system. The implementation is clean and maintains immutability.If the environments list is expected to be large, consider memoizing the filtered results:
const linkedEnvironments = useMemo( () => envs.filter((e) => e.policyId === policy.id), [envs, policy.id] );apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx (1)
83-89: Consider memoizing linkedEnvironments.The environment policy query and linkedEnvironments setup looks good. However, since this value is used in child components, consider memoizing it to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
- const linkedEnvironments = environmentPolicyQ.data?.environments ?? []; + const linkedEnvironments = React.useMemo( + () => environmentPolicyQ.data?.environments ?? [], + [environmentPolicyQ.data?.environments] + );apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (2)
34-38: Add error handling for mutation promisesConsider adding error handling to the
approveandrejectmutation promises to handle any potential errors during the approval or rejection process.Apply this diff to include error handling:
const onApprove = () => approve .mutateAsync({ releaseId, policyId }) .then(() => router.refresh()) .then(() => setOpen(false)) + .catch((error) => { + // Handle error, e.g., display a notification + console.error("Approval failed:", error); + }); const onReject = () => reject .mutateAsync({ releaseId, policyId }) .then(() => router.refresh()) .then(() => setOpen(false)) + .catch((error) => { + // Handle error, e.g., display a notification + console.error("Rejection failed:", error); + });Also applies to: 39-45
46-46: MoveuseRouterhook above function definitionsThe
useRouterhook should be called before any functions that use it to comply with React's Rules of Hooks and prevent potential issues with hook ordering.Apply this diff to rearrange the code:
+ const router = useRouter(); const [open, setOpen] = useState(false); const approve = api.environment.policy.approval.approve.useMutation(); const reject = api.environment.policy.approval.reject.useMutation(); - const router = useRouter(); const releaseId = release.id;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
apps/jobs/src/policy-checker/index.ts(2 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx(4 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentNode.tsx(0 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx(4 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx(3 hunks)apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/jobs/[jobId]/route.ts(3 hunks)packages/api/src/router/environment-approval.ts(3 hunks)packages/api/src/router/environment-policy.ts(4 hunks)packages/api/src/router/environment.ts(0 hunks)packages/db/drizzle/0055_wandering_rogue.sql(1 hunks)packages/db/drizzle/meta/_journal.json(1 hunks)packages/db/src/schema/environment.ts(1 hunks)packages/job-dispatch/src/policies/manual-approval.ts(2 hunks)packages/job-dispatch/src/policy-create.ts(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- packages/api/src/router/environment.ts
- apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentNode.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (12)
packages/job-dispatch/src/policy-create.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
packages/job-dispatch/src/policies/manual-approval.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/jobs/src/policy-checker/index.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
packages/api/src/router/environment-policy.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/jobs/[jobId]/route.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
packages/db/src/schema/environment.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
packages/api/src/router/environment-approval.ts (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Typecheck
- GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
- GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
- GitHub Check: Lint
🔇 Additional comments (31)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx (1)
53-53: Verify linkedEnvironments usage in dependent components.Let's ensure that all components consuming this new property are properly updated.
✅ Verification successful
All components are properly consuming the linkedEnvironments property
The linkedEnvironments property is correctly implemented across all dependent components:
- FlowPolicyNode (consumer)
- ApprovalCheck (consumer)
- ResourceReleaseTable (consumer)
- EnvironmentApprovalRow (consumer)
- FlowDiagram (provider)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components that might need the linkedEnvironments property rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "PolicyNode|FlowPolicyNode" --glob "!{node_modules,dist}/**" # Search for potential PropTypes or interface definitions that might need updating ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ linkedEnvironments $$$ }'Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PolicyNode components and linkedEnvironments usage rg -t tsx -t ts "PolicyNode|FlowPolicyNode" -B 2 -A 2 --glob "!{node_modules,dist}/**" rg -t tsx -t ts "linkedEnvironments" -B 2 -A 2 --glob "!{node_modules,dist}/**" # Search for interface definitions and property usage ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ linkedEnvironments $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern '$_.linkedEnvironments'Length of output: 34121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for FlowPolicyNode imports and usage rg "FlowPolicyNode" --type-add "ts:*.{ts,tsx}" --type ts -B 2 -A 2 # Search for linkedEnvironments in type definitions and interfaces rg "linkedEnvironments" --type-add "ts:*.{ts,tsx}" --type ts -B 2 -A 2 # Search for type definitions using ast-grep ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = { $$$ linkedEnvironments $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ linkedEnvironments $$$ }'Length of output: 12989
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx (2)
155-156: Verify EnvironmentApprovalRow component compatibility.The component now receives
releaseandlinkedEnvironmentsinstead ofenvironment. Ensure that the EnvironmentApprovalRow component has been updated to handle these new props correctly.✅ Verification successful
Component implementation verified and compatible
The EnvironmentApprovalRow component has been properly updated to handle the new props structure. It correctly uses
releaseandlinkedEnvironmentsprops along with the policy-based approval system. The oldenvironmentprop has been completely removed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify EnvironmentApprovalRow component changes # Check for any remaining references to the old environment prop ast-grep --pattern 'EnvironmentApprovalRow $props environment=' # Find the component definition to verify prop types ast-grep --pattern 'type EnvironmentApprovalRowProps = {'Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find EnvironmentApprovalRow component file fd EnvironmentApprovalRow # Once found, let's examine its content rg -B2 -A5 "EnvironmentApprovalRow.*=.*" --type typescript # Try a different ast-grep pattern for interface/type definition ast-grep --pattern 'interface EnvironmentApprovalRowProps'Length of output: 328
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Read the component file cat "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx" # Also try rg without type specification as backup rg -B2 -A5 "EnvironmentApprovalRow.*=.*" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx"Length of output: 1945
65-71: Verify the policy-based approval filtering.The change from environment-based to policy-based approval filtering looks correct. However, we should ensure that all approvals are properly matched when multiple environments share the same policy.
Run this script to verify the approval matching:
✅ Verification successful
Policy-based approval filtering is correctly implemented
The current implementation properly handles cases where multiple environments share the same policy. The filtering logic ensures that approvals are correctly matched with the environment's policy, which is the intended behavior for the policy-based approval system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for environments sharing the same policy to ensure correct approval matching # Find environments sharing policies ast-grep --pattern 'environment.policyId === $policy' # Check approval queries ast-grep --pattern 'api.environment.policy.approval.byReleaseId'Length of output: 341
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for policy-based filtering patterns ast-grep --pattern 'filter($$$) => $$.policyId' # Look for policy-related components and hooks rg -l "policyId|PolicyId" --type ts --type tsx # Check for environment-policy relationships ast-grep --pattern 'environment: { $$$, policyId: $$ }'Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for policy-related code with corrected file type rg -l "policyId|PolicyId" --type typescript # Look for policy-based filtering with more flexible patterns ast-grep --pattern 'filter((a) => a.policyId' # Check for environment-policy relationships with broader pattern ast-grep --pattern 'environment.policyId' # Search for approval-related code rg -B2 -A2 "approval" --type typescriptLength of output: 34994
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (2)
Line range hint
22-79: ApprovalDialog component updated correctlyThe changes to the
ApprovalDialogcomponent correctly implement the new props and logic for policy-based approvals. The modifications align with the intended shift and maintain component integrity.
Line range hint
81-140: ApprovalCheck component revisions are appropriateThe updates to the
ApprovalCheckcomponent effectively integrate the new policy-based approval system. The conditional rendering and status handling are well-implemented.packages/api/src/router/environment-approval.ts (3)
Line range hint
33-70: Database queries updated appropriately to use policy-based approvalsThe modifications in the queries reflect the shift to
SCHEMA.environmentPolicyApprovaland are correctly structured with appropriate joins and conditions.
71-107: Approve mutation correctly updatedThe
approvemutation now correctly usespolicyIdand updates theenvironmentPolicyApprovaltable accordingly. The dispatch logic for release job triggers is appropriately adjusted.
132-158: Reject mutation and status query updated correctlyThe
rejectmutation andstatusByReleasePolicyIdprocedure are updated to usepolicyId, and the raw SQL for updating job statuses is correctly constructed.apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx (2)
14-16: Props updated to reflect policy-based approvalsThe
EnvironmentApprovalRowPropstype now includesreleaseandlinkedEnvironments, aligning with the new approval structure. These updates ensure the component receives all necessary data.
24-35: Conditional rendering of ApprovalDialog is appropriateThe component now correctly renders the
ApprovalDialogwhen the approval status is "pending", utilizing the updated props. This enhances the user interface and aligns with the new approval flow.packages/job-dispatch/src/policy-create.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM! Consistent schema transition to policy-based approvals.The changes correctly implement the transition from environment-based to policy-based approvals, maintaining data integrity with proper foreign key relationships.
Also applies to: 40-46
19-19: Verify the impact of usingenvironmentPolicy.idinselectDistinctOn.The change from using
environment.idtoenvironmentPolicy.idinselectDistinctOncould affect the uniqueness criteria. Please ensure this doesn't lead to duplicate approvals.✅ Verification successful
The change to use
environmentPolicy.idinselectDistinctOnis correct and safeThe change aligns with the schema design where approvals are tracked at the policy level, not the environment level. The uniqueness is maintained through:
- One-to-one relationship between environment and policy
- Unique constraint on (policyId, releaseId) in the approvals table
- Correct join chain ensuring policy-level grouping
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential duplicate approvals ast-grep --pattern 'selectDistinctOn([$$_environment.id$$$])' | grep -v 'environmentPolicy.id'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all selectDistinctOn usages rg "selectDistinctOn" -A 2 -B 2 # Look for type definitions or interfaces related to environment and environmentPolicy ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Environment { $$$ }' # Search for environment and environmentPolicy relationship rg "environmentPolicy|environment" --type typescript -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 1382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for environment and policy relationships in TypeScript files rg "environmentPolicy|environment" -t ts -A 2 -B 2 # Look for schema or table definitions rg "createTable|schema" -t ts -A 3 -B 3 # Search for type definitions related to the tables ast-grep --pattern 'type $_Table = { $$$ }'Length of output: 74536
packages/job-dispatch/src/policies/manual-approval.ts (2)
36-42: LGTM! Proper join conditions for policy approvals.The join conditions correctly link the policy approvals with their corresponding releases and policies.
56-56: LGTM! Consistent status check.The status check is properly updated to use the new policy approval field.
apps/jobs/src/policy-checker/index.ts (2)
16-16: LGTM! Proper approval gate condition.The approval gate condition correctly checks the policy approval status.
32-42: LGTM! Well-structured join conditions.The join conditions properly link policy approvals with their corresponding policies and releases.
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM! Proper type definitions.The Environment type is properly imported and integrated into the PolicyNodeProps.
Also applies to: 26-26
105-105: LGTM! Well-structured conditional rendering.The approval check is properly integrated with the correct props being passed to the ApprovalCheck component.
Also applies to: 116-122
124-124: LGTM! Comprehensive policy check handling.The condition for displaying "No policy checks" properly includes all three cases: no minimum success requirement, no rollout, and no approval requirement.
packages/db/drizzle/0055_wandering_rogue.sql (3)
1-9: LGTM! Table creation and drop statements are well structured.The migration correctly:
- Creates the new policy-based approval table with appropriate columns and constraints
- Drops the old environment-based approval table
28-28: LGTM! Unique index ensures data integrity.The unique index on (policy_id, release_id) correctly ensures that there can only be one approval per policy and release combination.
10-26: Verify data migration strategy.While the foreign key constraints are correctly defined with appropriate cascade rules, ensure there's a strategy to migrate existing approval data before dropping the old table.
Run this script to check for existing approvals that need migration:
packages/db/src/schema/environment.ts (2)
233-246: LGTM! Schema definition aligns with migration.The
environmentPolicyApprovaltable definition correctly matches the SQL migration with proper types and constraints.
249-251: LGTM! Type definition ensures type safety.The exported type
EnvironmentPolicyApprovalcorrectly reflects the table structure.packages/api/src/router/environment-policy.ts (2)
30-31: LGTM! Router composition is correct.The approval router is properly integrated into the policy router.
Line range hint
151-182: LGTM! Query enhancement improves data access.The addition of environment data to the policy query provides necessary context for the new policy-based approval system.
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/jobs/[jobId]/route.ts (4)
16-16: LGTM! Type definition updated correctly.The
ApprovalJoinResulttype properly reflects the schema changes.
20-31: LGTM! Function signature and query updated appropriately.The
getApprovalDetailsfunction correctly uses policy-based approval:
- Updated parameter from
environmentIdtopolicyId- Updated table reference to
environmentPolicyApproval- Updated join conditions
41-44: LGTM! Response mapping updated consistently.The
mapApprovalResponsefunction correctly maps the new schema structure.
126-130: Verify null safety in approval check.The approval check correctly uses optional chaining, but verify that
policyIdis always set when approvals are required.Run this script to check for environments that require approvals but don't have a policy:
✅ Verification successful
Null safety in approval check is properly implemented.
The code correctly handles null cases through:
- Optional chaining for both
je.release?.idandje.environment?.policyId- Environments without policy automatically bypass approval requirements
- Database schema and queries properly handle null relationships
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find environments that might require approvals but don't have a policy ast-grep --pattern 'const environment = { $$$ policyId: null, $$$ approvalRequirement: "manual", $$$ }'Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find type definitions and usages related to environment, policy, and approvals # Search for type definitions echo "=== Type definitions ===" ast-grep --pattern 'type $_Environment = { $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Interface definitions ===" ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Environment { $$$ }' echo -e "\n=== Approval requirement references ===" rg "approvalRequirement.*manual" -A 2 -B 2 echo -e "\n=== Policy ID usage patterns ===" rg "policyId" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 62323
packages/db/drizzle/meta/_journal.json (1)
389-395: LGTM! The migration journal entry is well-structured.The new entry follows the established pattern with sequential indexing, consistent versioning, and proper timestamp ordering.
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "idx": 55, | ||
| "version": "7", | ||
| "when": 1737154626633, | ||
| "tag": "0055_wandering_rogue", | ||
| "breakpoints": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration strategy requires attention before deployment
The migration shows a direct table replacement without data preservation:
- Existing approvals in
environment_approvalwill be lost when the table is dropped - No data migration script found to transfer approvals to the new
environment_policy_approvaltable - Frontend and backend changes are coordinated, but deployment documentation is missing
While the code changes are well-coordinated across frontend and backend, please ensure:
- Create a data migration plan to preserve existing approvals
- Document the deployment sequence to minimize disruption
- Consider a phased rollout strategy to validate the new policy-based system
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the migration strategy for the approval system changes.
This migration represents a significant architectural change from environment-based to policy-based approvals. Please ensure:
- Data migration plan exists for existing approvals
- Backward compatibility or upgrade path is documented
- Frontend and backend changes are coordinated for deployment
Let's verify the related migration files and changes:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the migration impact and related changes
# Check the actual migration SQL
echo "=== Migration SQL ==="
cat packages/db/drizzle/0055_wandering_rogue.sql
# Look for related approval system changes
echo -e "\n=== Related Changes ==="
rg -l "environmentApproval|environmentPolicyApproval" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for potential breaking changes in TypeScript files
echo -e "\n=== Type Changes ==="
rg -A 3 "interface.*Approval|type.*Approval" --type ts
Length of output: 3896
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for migration documentation and deployment instructions
# Check README files
echo "=== README Files ==="
fd -e md -e mdx . | xargs cat
# Check for migration scripts
echo -e "\n=== Migration Scripts ==="
fd -e sh -e js -e ts -p "migrate" .
# Look for deployment docs
echo -e "\n=== Deployment Docs ==="
fd -g "*deploy*.md" -g "*migration*.md" .
Length of output: 70870
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Database Changes
environment_policy_approvaltableenvironment_approvaltable with policy-focused approval trackingUI Updates
Backend Modifications