Skip to content

Conversation

@adityachoudhari26
Copy link
Contributor

@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 commented Jan 24, 2025

Screen_Recording_2025-01-24_at_1.27.11_PM.mov

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced deployment approval workflow with dynamic approval status checks.
    • Added loading states for policy and environment queries.
    • Integrated approval dialog for pending release approvals.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved rendering logic to prevent displaying release information during pending approvals.
    • Streamlined data handling for environment and policy information.
  • Refactor

    • Removed linkedEnvironments prop from multiple components.
    • Updated component logic to fetch environment data via API queries.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the deployment and release approval workflow across multiple components. The modifications focus on fetching and handling approval status dynamically, removing static linked environments, and updating the rendering logic to conditionally display release information and approval dialogs. The changes streamline the approval process by relying on API queries to retrieve environment and policy details, enhancing the component's flexibility and data retrieval mechanism.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/webservice/src/.../ReleaseEnvironmentCell.tsx - Added new query to fetch approval status
- Modified loading state to include isApprovalLoading
- Updated showRelease condition to check isPendingApproval
- Added ApprovalDialog component
- Unconditional DeployButton rendering
apps/webservice/src/.../ApprovalCheck.tsx - Removed linkedEnvironments prop
- Added policy query to fetch environments
- Added loading state with spinner
- Dynamically render environments from query
apps/webservice/src/.../EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx - Removed linkedEnvironments prop
- Simplified ApprovalDialog invocation
apps/webservice/src/.../ResourceReleaseTable.tsx - Removed environmentPolicyQ query
- Eliminated linkedEnvironments variable
apps/webservice/src/.../FlowDiagram.tsx - Removed filtering of environments based on policy ID
- Simplified data model for policy nodes
apps/webservice/src/.../FlowPolicyNode.tsx - Removed linkedEnvironments from PolicyNodeProps
- Updated ApprovalCheck invocation to exclude linkedEnvironments

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jsbroks

Poem

🐰 Deployment's dance, a rabbit's delight,
Approvals flow with newfound might,
Queries sing, environments gleam,
Code refactored, a developer's dream!
Hop along, release with grace! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5888a00 and 876fa9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx (0 hunks)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowDiagram.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/FlowPolicyNode.tsx (1)

132-132: Ensure environment data is properly retrieved inside ApprovalCheck.

Since you've removed the linkedEnvironments prop and now rely on querying environment data within the component, verify that the internal logic in ApprovalCheck is correctly resolving all required environment details. This helps maintain clarity and prevents potential data mismatch.

✅ Verification successful

Environment data handling in ApprovalCheck is properly implemented

The component correctly fetches and handles environment data through the policy API endpoints, making the removal of the linkedEnvironments prop a safe change.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Validate that the `ApprovalCheck` component no longer accepts or references `linkedEnvironments`
rg -A5 "<ApprovalCheck"

Length of output: 1061


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find ApprovalCheck component definition and implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function ApprovalCheck($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Backup search using ripgrep for any file containing ApprovalCheck
rg -l "ApprovalCheck"

Length of output: 609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of ApprovalCheck component
cat "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx"

# Look for any environment-related hooks or queries
rg -A 5 "useEnvironment|getEnvironment|fetchEnvironment" "apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx"

Length of output: 4964


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/ReleaseEnvironmentCell.tsx (2)

107-108: Consider using a status enum or union type.

approval?.status === "pending" is valid. For better type safety and maintainability, consider using enums or a discriminated union, rather than string literals.


174-186: Refine user feedback in approval dialog.

The ApprovalDialog is rendered correctly when approval is pending. Consider adding more explanatory text or a tooltip on the button to give users clarity about next steps.

apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (4)

26-28: Consider adding an error state for the policy query.
Currently, there's no UI handling for policyQ.isError. If the API call fails, users may see no information, leading to confusion.

} = ({ release, policyId, children }) => {
  const policyQ = api.environment.policy.byId.useQuery(policyId);

+ if (policyQ.isError) {
+   return (
+     <AlertDialogDescription>
+       Failed to load policy info. Please try again later.
+     </AlertDialogDescription>
+   );
+ }

43-43: Consider using async/await for clarity.
Chaining multiple .then() calls is fine, but an async/await style might improve readability and reduce nesting.


49-49: Apply the same async/await suggestion here for consistency.
Consolidate with the onApprove flow for uniform error handling.


66-83: Include a fallback for empty environments.
When policyQ.data?.environments is empty or undefined, it might be helpful to show a short message.

{!policyQ.isLoading && (
  <AlertDialogDescription>
    <div className="flex flex-col gap-2">
      Approves this release for the following environments:
      <div className="flex flex-wrap gap-2">
-       {policyQ.data?.environments.map(...)}
+       {policyQ.data?.environments?.length ? (
+         policyQ.data.environments.map(...)
+       ) : (
+         <span>No associated environments found.</span>
+       )}
      </div>
    </div>
  </AlertDialogDescription>
)}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d9043d and 5888a00.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/ReleaseEnvironmentCell.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ResourceReleaseTable.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/ReleaseEnvironmentCell.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/ReleaseEnvironmentCell.tsx (5)

21-21: Validate import path.

Confirm that "./[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck" is the correct source for ApprovalDialog.


52-57: Conditional fetch looks good.

Using environment.policyId ?? "" as a fallback and enabling the query conditionally prevents unnecessary requests. This approach is in compliance with the guidelines on error handling.


95-97: Aggregated loading state is well-handled.

Combining all loading flags into a single isLoading variable maintains clarity. Ensure you handle or display potential error states elsewhere in the flow.


113-114: Verify the desired user flow for pending approvals.

Hiding the release when isPendingApproval might be intentional. Confirm that this matches the UX requirements for pending states.


187-187: Ensure coherent fallback for deployment.

Rendering the DeployButton when no other condition applies is straightforward. Verify that this behavior aligns with expected user workflows.

apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/EnvironmentApprovalRow.tsx (2)

3-3: Removal of unused types aligns with code cleanup

Thanks for removing the Environment import if it's no longer used. This keeps dependencies minimal and the file more maintainable.


20-20: Consistent removal of the linkedEnvironments prop

Passing only release and policyId simplifies this component’s interface, aligning with the shift away from props-based environment data. Confirm that any logic relying on linkedEnvironments now relies on an appropriate API or other data source.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: ApprovalDialog successfully migrated from props to API-based data fetching

The component now consistently uses only release and policyId props across all usages, with environment data being fetched through API queries. The remaining linkedEnvironments references in the codebase are in unrelated Flow components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that there are no remaining references to the removed `linkedEnvironments` prop
rg 'linkedEnvironments'

Length of output: 603


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find ApprovalDialog component definition and usages
ast-grep --pattern 'function ApprovalDialog'
rg -A 5 'ApprovalDialog.*=' 

Length of output: 3079


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find ApprovalDialog component definition
fd ApprovalDialog.tsx
rg -A 10 'export.*ApprovalDialog'

Length of output: 2007

apps/webservice/src/app/[workspaceSlug]/(app)/systems/[systemSlug]/deployments/[deploymentSlug]/releases/[versionId]/ApprovalCheck.tsx (7)

3-3: No issues with the newly added import.


32-37: Invalidate function looks good.
Clearing the cache after approve/reject is a sensible approach to keep data fresh.


52-52: No content to comment on.


61-65: Loading spinner implementation looks good.
This provides a clear user experience while data is being fetched.


86-90: Approve/Reject actions appear correct.
The footer structure is straightforward and consistent with standard UI patterns.


99-99: Signature changes look consistent with the removal of linkedEnvironments.
This aligns with the new approach that sources environment data from the query.


142-142: No issues in the updated usage of ApprovalDialog.
Passing only the needed props keeps the component concise.

@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 merged commit 4edaf3c into main Jan 26, 2025
7 checks passed
@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 deleted the pending-approval-button branch January 26, 2025 02:44
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2025
This was referenced Apr 10, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants