Skip to content

Conversation

@KSDaemon
Copy link
Member

@KSDaemon KSDaemon commented May 6, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.69%. Comparing base (785142d) to head (ec7d440).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (785142d) and HEAD (ec7d440). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (785142d) HEAD (ec7d440)
cubesql 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9546       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.38%   61.69%   -18.69%     
===========================================
  Files         395      174      -221     
  Lines       97932    14420    -83512     
  Branches     2278     2462      +184     
===========================================
- Hits        78723     8897    -69826     
+ Misses      18901     5154    -13747     
- Partials      308      369       +61     
Flag Coverage Δ
cube-backend 61.69% <ø> (+4.35%) ⬆️
cubesql ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@KSDaemon KSDaemon marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2025 11:57
@KSDaemon KSDaemon merged commit 7c9f298 into master May 7, 2025
35 checks passed
@KSDaemon KSDaemon deleted the chore/codecov-integration branch May 7, 2025 13:53
marianore-muttdata pushed a commit to MuttData/cube that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
)

* chore(ci): Upload integration tests coverage to codecov.io

* fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants