Skip to content

Conversation

@orenyodfat
Copy link
Contributor

fix #577
fix #576

@orenyodfat orenyodfat changed the title Use string as proposal's description hash (ipfs) Use string as proposal's description hash (for ipfs) Jan 5, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@jellegerbrandy jellegerbrandy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See nothing wrong but perhaps it would be better to use a consistent naming for more clarity: we now use descriptionHash almost everywhere, but also contributionDescription and contributionDescriptionHash Perhaps replace those last two?

@orenyodfat orenyodfat merged commit a7c6b3e into master Jan 7, 2019
@orenyodfat orenyodfat mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2019
@orenyodfat orenyodfat deleted the gh-issue-577 branch January 7, 2019 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"contributionDescription" type is too small to fit an IPFS hash everywhere "should success" should be "should succeed"

4 participants