Improve discord-botlist.eu #319
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These endpoints are not in the official docs, but they're in the offical library. Ref: https://github.com/dbleu/node-library/blob/0d812fc8a6f99b8d1889734176f045c685e8d37e/src/index.js#L41
This reverts commit a87ecf2.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #319 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.63% 97.63%
=======================================
Files 42 42
Lines 1182 1186 +4
Branches 189 189
=======================================
+ Hits 1154 1158 +4
Misses 27 27
Partials 1 1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Snazzah
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've improved on the discord-botlist.eu class added in #318:
These changes come not from the official docs, but from the official library: npm, GitHub
@Snazzah could you give it a look before we publish it?