Is using Claude Code OAuth with 9Router considered safe from an account / ToS perspective?

[callmemahmood]

Hi! thanks for building 9Router—it's a really impressive project.

I have a question regarding Claude Code OAuth specifically.

Since 9Router runs locally and acts as a local gateway/proxy between Claude Code (or other clients) and upstream providers, I'm wondering if there are any known risks associated with authenticating a Claude subscription via OAuth.

My main concerns are:

Has anyone experienced account warnings, OAuth revocations, or bans from Anthropic while using Claude Code OAuth through 9Router?
Has the team received any feedback from Anthropic regarding this usage pattern?
Is routing Claude Code traffic through 9Router considered within the expected use of the Claude Code subscription, or is it something users should treat as "use at your own risk"?
Are there any recommended best practices to minimize potential issues?

I understand that no one here can speak on behalf of Anthropic, but I'd love to hear the maintainers' perspective and the community's real-world experience.

Thanks! 🚀

[callmemahmood]

Yeah I saw ⚠️ Risk Notice: This provider uses a subscription/OAuth session not officially licensed for proxy/router use. Account may be restricted or banned. Use at your own risk., resolved thanks.

[Amar07Singh]

Hey @callmemahmood — how is Claude Code actually scaling with 9router?

Are you finding it handles the context cleanly, or does it start lagging and losing track of files pretty quickly?