Skip to content

Conversation

@Vibsteamer
Copy link

@Vibsteamer Vibsteamer commented Jul 24, 2025

using non-repeative sampling instead of the original repeative sampling when using "candi_sel_prob": "inv_pop_f".
random.choices -> numpy.random.choice(replace=False)

The original behavior could take a large portion of repeated long-tail low-frequency smaples (the longer the tail, the worse the case), causing tens of percents of repeated downstream fp calculations, moreover amplifying the noise in labels from these high-force configurations.

The non-repeated sampling re-nomalizes the prob after screening out each picked sample

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved candidate selection process to ensure unique selections when limiting the number of candidates, preventing duplicates in the output.
  • Tests

    • Updated tests to reflect changes in the candidate selection method and to ensure correct probability handling and uniqueness of selected candidates.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The candidate selection logic in the adaptive lower report module was updated to use numpy.random.choice for random sampling without replacement, ensuring unique candidates are selected. Corresponding test code was updated to mock and verify the new sampling method, including changes to function signatures and assertions to match the revised approach.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
dpgen2/exploration/report/report_adaptive_lower.py Modified candidate selection to use np.random.choice for sampling without replacement, ensuring unique candidates.
tests/exploration/test_report_adaptive_lower.py Updated test mock and assertions to align with new sampling logic and function signature.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • wanghan-iapcm

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8aaa7ca and f0e844d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • dpgen2/exploration/report/report_adaptive_lower.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/exploration/test_report_adaptive_lower.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
dpgen2/exploration/report/report_adaptive_lower.py (1)

449-455: LGTM! Excellent implementation of non-repetitive sampling.

The replacement of random.choices with np.random.choice using replace=False successfully addresses the PR objective of eliminating repetitive sampling. The probability normalization with p=prob / np.sum(prob) ensures the sampling distribution remains correct after each selection.

This change will effectively reduce redundant downstream fingerprint calculations and improve the quality of sampled data by avoiding repeated low-frequency samples.

tests/exploration/test_report_adaptive_lower.py (2)

200-221: Test implementation correctly mirrors the production code changes.

The mock function has been properly updated to match the new numpy.random.choice signature and behavior:

  • Parameters now match (a, size=None, replace=False, p=None)
  • Returns indices instead of candidate tuples
  • Probability assertions verify the correct inverse population distribution

The test logic ensures that the sampling behavior is correctly validated.


226-226: Mock patching target correctly updated.

The patch target has been properly changed from random.choices to numpy.random.choice to align with the production code changes.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.22%. Comparing base (8aaa7ca) to head (f0e844d).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #300   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.22%   84.22%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines        6111     6112    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         5147     5148    +1     
  Misses        964      964           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@zjgemi zjgemi merged commit 0a47c2e into deepmodeling:master Jul 25, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants