Skip to content

Conversation

@pantierra
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pantierra pantierra marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2025 18:42
@pantierra pantierra force-pushed the feature/wait-for-db-and-bootstrap branch from 360149e to 25c868e Compare April 1, 2025 19:05
@pantierra pantierra changed the title Add initCointainers to wait for db and it's bootstrap. Add initContainers to wait for db and it's bootstrap. Apr 1, 2025
@pantierra pantierra force-pushed the feature/wait-for-db-and-bootstrap branch 4 times, most recently from 7e39cb7 to 3d6f35b Compare April 1, 2025 19:39
@pantierra pantierra force-pushed the feature/wait-for-db-and-bootstrap branch from 3d6f35b to 2403fff Compare April 1, 2025 19:41
Copy link
Member

@vincentsarago vincentsarago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@pantierra pantierra merged commit 7944f70 into main Apr 1, 2025
2 checks passed
@pantierra pantierra deleted the feature/wait-for-db-and-bootstrap branch April 1, 2025 20:40
app: {{ $serviceName }}-{{ $.Release.Name }}
spec:
serviceAccountName: eoapi-sa-{{ $.Release.Name }}
{{- if eq $serviceName "stac" }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I worry a bit about these conditionals - if we start having more conditionals for each service, this seems like it could get ugly real quick. This is definitely fine for now, but this is something I'd think about and revisit as soon as we have even another conditional for a specific service.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Totally agree. This was one (unrelated) attempt to reduce conditionals: #161

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants