Fixed #28549 -- Fixed QuerySet.defer() with super and subclass fields. #8994
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Since this is a trivial patch (and my first), I've not added to |
timgraham
changed the title
Previously, deferring fields in different classes didn't omit the superclass' deferred field. Thanks Simon Charette for the suggested fix.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, deferring on multiple fields (in different classes) did not
properly omit the superclass' defered field; we were iterating the
fields from SubClass._meta.fields as well as SuperClass._meta.fields,
and only deferred one of those.
Changed to iterate .local_fields only, so we do the correct filtering.
Thanks to Simon Charette for the suggested fix.