Skip to content

Conversation

@kyren
Copy link
Collaborator

@kyren kyren commented Dec 6, 2024

Instead, just refer to whatever hashbrown is using directly.

Instead, just refer to whatever hashbrown is using directly.
@kyren
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kyren commented Dec 6, 2024

Hey @djc, I completely forgot to mention this in #30 before merging it, there's no downsides to wrapping DefaultHasher in this way instead, right? This is laziness maximalism here, if hashbrown changes the DefaultHashBuilder implementation in the future I don't want to have to do anything.

It seems rude to me to merge a PR and then immediately change it without a discussion, I actually didn't mean to do that.

Copy link
Owner

@djc djc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, this seems nicer!

@djc
Copy link
Owner

djc commented Dec 6, 2024

It seems rude to me to merge a PR and then immediately change it without a discussion, I actually didn't mean to do that.

I am completely fine with this, no worries!

@kyren kyren merged commit 11088cb into master Dec 6, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants