Skip to content

Conversation

@PeterStaar-IBM
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Peter Staar <taa@zurich.ibm.com>
@PeterStaar-IBM PeterStaar-IBM marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 07:59
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?(!)?:

🟢 Require two reviewer for test updates

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

When test data is updated, we require two reviewers

  • #approved-reviews-by >= 2

@dolfim-ibm
Copy link
Contributor

Shouldn't the CodeItem simply be a FloatingItem?

Signed-off-by: Michele Dolfi <dol@zurich.ibm.com>
@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm changed the title updated the CodeItem with captions feat: Redefine CodeItem as floating object with captions Feb 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cau-git cau-git left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐌

@PeterStaar-IBM PeterStaar-IBM merged commit 916323f into main Feb 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@PeterStaar-IBM PeterStaar-IBM deleted the dev/add-caption-footnotes-to-code-item branch February 14, 2025 10:34
muhark added a commit to muhark/docling-core that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
…ject#160)

* updated the CodeItem with captions

Signed-off-by: Peter Staar <taa@zurich.ibm.com>

* use FloatItem and add captions to add_code interface

Signed-off-by: Michele Dolfi <dol@zurich.ibm.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Peter Staar <taa@zurich.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michele Dolfi <dol@zurich.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Michele Dolfi <dol@zurich.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants